Split View: 출장 영어 완전 가이드: 하루 안에 손님에서 전문가로, 다시 낯선 사람으로
출장 영어 완전 가이드: 하루 안에 손님에서 전문가로, 다시 낯선 사람으로
들어가며: 단어를 몰라서 막히는 게 아니다
출장을 다녀온 사람에게 무엇이 제일 힘들었냐고 물으면 대답이 비슷합니다. 회의는 어떻게든 했는데 그 앞뒤가 힘들었다고요. 공항에서, 호텔 프런트에서, 로비에서 기다리는 5분 동안, 저녁 식사 자리에서 말이 안 나왔다고 합니다.
이상한 일입니다. 회의 영어가 훨씬 어려운 어휘를 쓰는데 회의는 되고 그 바깥은 안 됩니다. 이유는 어휘가 아닙니다. 회의에서는 내가 누구인지 분명하기 때문입니다. 나는 이 주제를 아는 사람이고, 그 자리에 있는 이유가 명확하고, 말투도 정해져 있습니다.
출장의 나머지 시간은 그렇지 않습니다. 같은 하루 안에서 나는 세 번쯤 다른 사람이 됩니다. 입국심사대 앞에서는 처리 대기 중인 낯선 사람이고, 고객사 로비에서는 대접받는 손님이고, 회의실에 들어가면 대등한 전문가입니다. 그리고 저녁 식탁에서는 이 셋이 섞입니다.
이 글의 전제는 하나입니다. 출장 영어가 어려운 건 어휘가 부족해서가 아니라 역할이 계속 바뀌기 때문이고, 역할마다 맞는 말의 등록이 다르기 때문입니다.
세 가지 역할, 세 가지 등록
언어학에서 등록은 상황에 따라 달라지는 말의 격식과 태도를 뜻합니다. 어려운 개념이 아닙니다. 같은 부탁을 상사에게 할 때와 동생에게 할 때 문장이 달라지는 그것입니다. 출장에서는 이 전환이 하루에 여러 번, 그것도 급하게 일어납니다.
| 역할 | 상대에게 나는 | 말의 등록 | 기본 태도 | 대표적 실패 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 낯선 사람 | 처리해야 할 한 명 | 짧고 명확, 사무적 정중함 | 요청을 한 문장으로 | 너무 길게 설명함 |
| 손님 | 대접하는 대상 | 따뜻하고 감사 표현 위주 | 받고, 고마워하고, 되돌려줌 | 사무적으로 굴어 차갑게 보임 |
| 전문가 | 대등한 동료 | 직설적이고 간결 | 의견을 분명히 말함 | 손님 모드가 남아 의견을 안 냄 |
낯선 사람일 때는 짧을수록 좋습니다. 입국심사관, 호텔 직원, 택시 기사는 나에게 관심이 없고 관심이 없는 게 정상입니다. 이들에게 필요한 건 처리에 필요한 정보뿐입니다. 여기서 문장을 길게 만들면 오히려 소통이 나빠집니다.
손님일 때는 따뜻할수록 좋습니다. 상대는 시간을 내고 회의실을 잡고 점심을 준비했습니다. 이 자리에서 필요한 건 정확한 문장이 아니라 감사가 담긴 반응입니다.
전문가일 때는 분명할수록 좋습니다. 여기서는 정중함보다 명확함이 먼저입니다. 애매하게 말하면 배려가 아니라 준비가 안 된 것으로 읽힙니다.
역할이 바뀌는데 등록이 안 바뀔 때
실제로 출장에서 벌어지는 문제의 대부분은 어느 한 역할을 못 해서가 아니라, 이미 끝난 역할의 말투를 다음 장면까지 끌고 가서 생깁니다. 세 가지 형태로 나타납니다.
손님 등록을 회의실까지 끌고 가는 경우. 가장 흔하고 가장 손해가 큽니다. 로비에서 환대받은 기세 그대로 회의실에 들어가서, 상대가 무슨 말을 해도 좋다고만 합니다. 반대 의견이 있는데 말하지 않고, 일정이 무리인데 알겠다고 합니다. 비행기를 열 시간 타고 온 이유가 사라지는 순간입니다. 회의실 문턱을 넘을 때는 손님에서 동료로 갈아타야 합니다.
전문가 등록을 저녁 자리까지 끌고 가는 경우. 낮에 하던 논쟁을 식탁에서 이어 갑니다. 본인은 성실한 것이지만 상대에게는 하루가 안 끝나는 느낌입니다. 저녁은 대개 일의 연장이 아니라 관계의 자리입니다.
낯선 사람 등록을 첫인사에 끌고 가는 경우. 공항과 호텔에서 몇 시간 동안 사무적으로 짧게 말하다가, 그 리듬 그대로 고객사 로비에 들어섭니다. 필요한 정보만 말하고 웃지 않습니다. 상대는 무례하다고 생각하지 않지만 차갑다고는 느낍니다.
역할이 바뀌는 신호는 거의 항상 같습니다. 장소가 바뀌거나 사람 수가 바뀌는 순간입니다. 로비에서 회의실로, 회의실에서 식당으로, 식당에서 호텔로. 그 문턱에서 한 번만 지금 나는 누구인지 갱신하면 됩니다. 표현을 백 개 외우는 것보다 이 습관 하나가 크게 작동합니다.
낯선 사람 1: 입국심사와 공항
먼저 분명히 해 둘 것이 있습니다. 입국심사에서 하는 답은 사실이어야 합니다. 여기 정리한 것은 사실을 짧고 분명하게 전달하는 문장의 형태이지, 심사를 통과하기 위한 요령이 아닙니다. 사실과 다르게 말하는 것은 어떤 상황에서도 선택지가 아니고, 대부분의 나라에서 그 자체가 심각한 문제가 됩니다. 준비해야 할 것은 말재주가 아니라 서류입니다. 초청장, 예약 확인서, 귀국 항공권처럼 내가 말한 내용을 뒷받침하는 자료를 꺼내기 쉬운 곳에 두면 됩니다.
그 위에서, 영어로 인해 생기는 불필요한 오해만 줄이면 됩니다. 심사관의 질문은 대부분 정해져 있고 답은 짧아도 됩니다.
| 질문 | 짧은 답의 형태 |
|---|---|
| What is the purpose of your visit? | Business. / Business meetings. |
| How long will you be staying? | Five days. / Until the twelfth. |
| Where will you be staying? | At a hotel downtown. I have the booking here. |
| Who are you meeting? | Our partner company. I have the invitation letter. |
| Have you been here before? | Yes, last year. / No, this is my first time. |
| Do you have a return ticket? | Yes, I can show you. |
한 단어나 한 구로 끝나는 답이 정상입니다. 문장을 길게 만들 필요가 전혀 없고, 오히려 길어질수록 발음과 문법에서 사고가 날 확률만 올라갑니다.
못 알아들었을 때 되묻는 것은 전혀 이상한 일이 아닙니다. 심사관은 하루에 수백 번 같은 질문을 하고 되묻는 사람도 수십 명씩 봅니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Sorry, could you repeat that? | 다시 말씀해 주시겠어요? |
| Sorry, I didn't catch that. | 못 알아들었습니다. |
| Do you mean the hotel address? | 호텔 주소를 말씀하시는 건가요? |
| Let me check my itinerary. | 일정표를 확인해 보겠습니다. |
| Can I show you the document? | 서류를 보여 드려도 될까요? |
모르는 것은 모른다고 하고 서류를 확인하면 됩니다. Let me check my itinerary는 추측해서 틀린 답을 말하는 것보다 언제나 낫습니다.
공항 안에서 쓰는 표현은 더 단순합니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Is this the line for connecting flights? | 환승 줄이 여기 맞나요? |
| Which terminal is gate 42 in? | 42번 게이트가 몇 터미널인가요? |
| I have a tight connection. Can I go ahead? | 환승 시간이 촉박한데 먼저 가도 될까요? |
| Where can I get a SIM card? | 유심은 어디서 사나요? |
| Is there a shuttle to the city? | 시내 가는 셔틀이 있나요? |
영국에서는 줄을 queue라고 합니다. Is this the queue for...가 자연스럽고, 미국에서는 line을 씁니다. 서로 알아듣기는 하므로 큰 문제는 아닙니다.
낯선 사람 2: 호텔 체크인과 방 문제
호텔 프런트는 짧은 문장이 가장 잘 통하는 곳입니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Hi, I have a reservation under Kim. | 김으로 예약했습니다. |
| Checking in, please. | 체크인하려고요. |
| Could I get a quiet room if there's one available? | 가능하면 조용한 방으로 부탁드려요. |
| What time is breakfast? | 조식은 몇 시인가요? |
| Is breakfast included? | 조식이 포함인가요? |
| What's the wifi password? | 와이파이 비밀번호가 뭔가요? |
| Could I get a late checkout? | 늦은 체크아웃 가능할까요? |
| Can I leave my bags here after checkout? | 체크아웃 후에 짐을 맡길 수 있나요? |
예약이 안 보인다고 할 때가 있습니다. 한국 이름은 서구권 예약 시스템에서 성과 이름이 뒤바뀌어 들어가는 일이 잦습니다. 이걸 알고 먼저 말해 주면 대부분 그 자리에서 풀립니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Could you check under my first name as well? | 이름 쪽으로도 찾아봐 주시겠어요? |
| Sometimes it gets entered the other way around. | 가끔 순서가 바뀌어 들어가더라고요. |
| Here's the confirmation number. | 예약 번호 여기 있습니다. |
방에 문제가 있을 때는 감정을 싣지 않고 사실과 요청만 말하는 편이 빠릅니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 | 톤 |
|---|---|---|
| The room's quite noisy. Would it be possible to move? | 방이 시끄러운데 옮길 수 있을까요? | 부드러운 요청 |
| The air conditioning isn't working. | 에어컨이 작동하지 않습니다. | 사실 진술 |
| There's no hot water in my room. | 방에 온수가 안 나옵니다. | 사실 진술 |
| I'd rather not stay in this room, to be honest. | 솔직히 이 방은 좀 어렵겠습니다. | 한 단계 강함 |
| What are my options? | 어떤 방법이 있을까요? | 해결 유도 |
마지막 문장이 이 글에서 가장 쓸모가 많은 한 마디일 수 있습니다. 불만을 말하는 대신 선택지를 물으면 상대가 해결책을 꺼내는 쪽으로 대화가 넘어갑니다. 항공사 카운터, 렌터카, 식당 예약 어디서든 그대로 씁니다.
호텔에서 헷갈리기 쉬운 것이 층 표기입니다. 영국을 비롯한 여러 나라에서 first floor는 우리 기준 2층이고 1층은 ground floor입니다. 미국은 first floor가 1층입니다. 엘리베이터 버튼의 G나 0을 확인하는 편이 확실합니다. 엘리베이터 자체도 미국은 elevator, 영국은 lift입니다.
손님 1: 고객사와 지사 방문 첫인사
여기서 등록이 바뀝니다. 짧고 사무적이던 말투를 조금 데워야 합니다.
리셉션에서는 여전히 짧게 갑니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Hi, I'm Youngju Kim from Acme. I'm here to see Sarah at ten. | 에이크미의 김영주입니다. 10시에 사라 님 뵙기로 했습니다. |
| I think she's expecting me. | 아마 기다리고 계실 거예요. |
| Should I wait here? | 여기서 기다리면 될까요? |
담당자를 만나는 순간부터 온도가 올라갑니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 | 언제 |
|---|---|---|
| Good to finally put a face to the name. | 드디어 직접 뵙네요. | 원격으로만 일하던 상대 |
| It's great to finally meet in person. | 직접 뵙게 되어 반갑습니다. | 위와 같은 상황, 조금 더 격식 |
| Thanks for having us. | 초대해 주셔서 감사합니다. | 방문한 쪽의 기본 인사 |
| Thanks for making the time. I know it's a busy week. | 바쁘신데 시간 내주셔서 감사합니다. | 회의 시작 직전 |
| You have a nice office. | 사무실 좋네요. | 안내받으며 걷는 중 |
| Thanks for setting all this up. | 이렇게 준비해 주셔서 감사합니다. | 일정 전체에 대한 감사 |
put a face to the name은 이름만 알던 사람을 직접 만났을 때 쓰는 굳어진 표현입니다. 요즘처럼 몇 년을 화면으로만 일하다 처음 만나는 경우가 많은 상황에 정확히 맞습니다.
호칭은 나라와 회사마다 다릅니다. 미국, 영국, 호주 대부분의 회사에서는 처음부터 이름을 부릅니다. 독일어권에서는 성과 존칭을 쓰다가 상대가 이름을 권할 때 바뀌는 경우가 여전히 있고, 일본에서는 성에 경칭을 붙입니다. 외워야 할 규칙이 아니라 하나의 습관으로 해결하는 편이 낫습니다. 상대가 자기를 소개하는 방식을 그대로 따라 하면 됩니다. 상대가 I'm Michael이라고 하면 마이클이라고 부르고, I'm Dr. Weber라고 하면 그렇게 부릅니다. 명함 관행도 마찬가지로 나라마다 차이가 크므로, 상대가 꺼내면 꺼내고 안 꺼내면 굳이 먼저 꺼내지 않아도 무방합니다.
손님에서 전문가로: 회의 전 5분
회의실에 앉아서 사람들이 다 모이기를 기다리는 몇 분이 있습니다. 많은 사람이 여기를 가장 힘들어합니다. 할 일이 없고, 침묵은 어색하고, 무슨 말을 해야 할지 모르겠는 시간입니다.
이 구간에서 나올 질문은 놀랍도록 예측 가능합니다.
| 상대가 물을 것 | 이렇게 받습니다 |
|---|---|
| How was the flight? | Not too bad, about eleven hours. I slept most of it. |
| Long trip? | Long enough. But the timing worked out fine. |
| First time here? | First time in Munich, yes. Second time in Germany. |
| How are you finding the city? | Really nice so far. I only saw it from the taxi though. |
| Are you over the jet lag? | Getting there. Ask me again after lunch. |
| Is the hotel okay? | Yes, it's close by, which helps. |
여기서 한국 학습자가 가장 자주 놓치는 것은 답의 내용이 아니라 그 뒤입니다. 답만 하고 끝내면 상대가 계속 질문을 만들어야 합니다. 한 조각을 붙이고 되돌려주면 대화가 알아서 굴러갑니다.
| 되돌려주는 질문 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Have you been to Seoul? | 서울 와보신 적 있어요? |
| Do you travel much for work? | 출장 자주 다니세요? |
| Have you been in this office long? | 이 사무실에 오래 계셨어요? |
| Anything I should see if I get a free morning? | 오전에 시간 나면 뭘 보면 좋을까요? |
이 구조를 좀 더 자세히 다룬 글이 따로 있습니다. 탁구 영어 스몰톡 완전 가이드에서 반응하고, 내 얘기를 붙이고, 되돌려주는 세 박자를 정리했습니다. 출장 로비에서도 같은 리듬이 그대로 작동합니다.
그리고 회의가 시작되면 등록을 바꿔야 합니다. 이 전환을 말로 표시해 주면 나에게도 상대에게도 편합니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Shall we get started? | 시작할까요? |
| Should we dive in? | 바로 들어갈까요? |
| I've got a couple of things I'd like to get to today. | 오늘 다루고 싶은 게 몇 가지 있습니다. |
| Before we start, is there anything you want to add to the agenda? | 시작 전에 추가하실 안건 있으신가요? |
마지막 문장은 방문자가 쓰기에 특히 좋습니다. 손님이면서도 회의를 주도하는 자리로 자연스럽게 옮겨 가는 문장입니다.
함께 식사할 때
식사 자리는 손님 등록이 다시 강해지는 구간입니다. 다만 두 가지는 예외적으로 분명하게 말해야 합니다. 알레르기와 못 먹는 것입니다.
메뉴를 고를 때
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Is there anything you'd recommend? | 추천해 주실 게 있을까요? |
| What's good here? | 여기 뭐가 맛있어요? |
| I'll have what you're having. | 같은 걸로 할게요. |
| I'm happy with anything. | 저는 아무거나 좋습니다. |
| Is this a lot of food or should I get two? | 이거 양이 많은 편인가요? |
I'm happy with anything은 정중하지만, 상대가 오히려 고민하게 만들기도 합니다. 한두 번은 괜찮고, 계속 쓰면 상대에게 결정 부담을 넘기는 게 됩니다.
알레르기와 못 먹는 것
여기서는 정중함보다 명확함이 먼저입니다. 완곡하게 말하면 주방까지 전달되지 않을 수 있고, 그 대가가 큽니다. 이건 문화 차이가 아니라 안전 문제라서 어느 나라에서도 직설적으로 말하는 게 맞습니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 | 왜 이렇게 |
|---|---|---|
| I'm allergic to shellfish. Does this have any? | 갑각류 알레르기가 있는데 이거 들어가나요? | 알레르기라고 먼저 밝힘 |
| It's an allergy, not a preference. | 취향이 아니라 알레르기입니다. | 주방이 심각하게 받아들이게 함 |
| Could you check with the kitchen? | 주방에 확인해 주시겠어요? | 서버가 확신 없어 보일 때 |
| I can't eat pork. Is there something else on here? | 돼지고기를 못 먹는데 다른 게 있을까요? | 종교나 식습관 |
| I'm vegetarian, but I eat fish. | 채식인데 생선은 먹습니다. | 범위를 먼저 밝힘 |
| Nothing too spicy for me, if that's okay. | 너무 매운 건 어렵습니다. | 선호는 부드럽게 |
It's an allergy, not a preference는 알레르기가 있는 사람들이 실제로 쓰는 문장입니다. 취향 요청과 구분해 달라는 신호이고, 대부분의 식당에서 태도가 즉시 달라집니다.
계산할 때
계산 관행은 나라와 회사마다 다릅니다. 초대한 쪽이 내는 경우가 흔하지만, 회사 정책상 각자 처리해야 하는 곳도 많고, 접대 관련 규정이 엄격해서 아예 받을 수 없는 곳도 있습니다. 단정하지 말고 제안하는 형태로 말하는 편이 안전합니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 | 상황 |
|---|---|---|
| Let me get this one. | 이번엔 제가 낼게요. | 먼저 제안 |
| Please, you're our guest. | 손님이신데요. | 내가 초대한 쪽일 때 |
| Thank you. Next one's on me. | 감사합니다, 다음은 제가요. | 사양하고 받아들일 때 |
| Should we split it? | 나눠서 낼까요? | 대등한 관계 |
| Our policy is that we cover our own. I hope that's okay. | 저희는 각자 정산하는 규정이라서요. | 회사 규정일 때 |
마지막 표현이 실제로 가장 자주 필요합니다. 정책 때문이라고 밝히면 상대의 호의를 거절하는 게 아니라 제약을 공유하는 것이 되어 아무도 불편하지 않습니다.
팁도 나라마다 완전히 다릅니다. 미국은 대체로 팁이 기본 기대치이고, 유럽 여러 나라는 서비스료가 포함되어 있거나 소액 반올림 정도로 끝나며, 일본에서는 팁 자체가 관행이 아닙니다. 같은 유럽 안에서도 나라마다 다르므로 일반화하지 않는 게 좋습니다. 확인이 필요하면 현지 동행에게 묻는 것이 가장 빠릅니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Is tipping expected here? | 여기 팁 주는 게 일반적인가요? |
| Is service included? | 서비스료가 포함인가요? |
| How much do people usually leave? | 보통 얼마나 남기나요? |
식당에서 계산서를 부르는 말도 갈립니다. 미국은 check, 영국은 bill이 일반적입니다. Could we get the check?와 Could we get the bill? 둘 다 어디서나 통합니다.
저녁 자리: 술을 사양하는 법과 화제의 경계
술을 정중히 사양하기
이건 별도의 항목으로 다룰 만큼 자주 필요합니다. 그리고 결론부터 말하면, 대부분의 서구권 비즈니스 자리에서 술을 사양하는 데 설명은 필요하지 않습니다. 이유를 대지 않아도 됩니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 | 톤 |
|---|---|---|
| None for me, thanks. | 저는 괜찮습니다. | 가장 무난, 설명 없음 |
| I'm good, thanks. | 저는 됐습니다. | 캐주얼, 리필 사양에도 |
| Just water for me. | 물만 주세요. | 자연스럽고 짧음 |
| I'll have a sparkling water. | 탄산수로 할게요. | 대체 음료를 먼저 제시 |
| I don't drink, but please go ahead. | 저는 술을 안 마십니다, 편하게 드세요. | 분명하게 밝히기 |
| I've got an early flight, so I'll stick to tea. | 아침 비행기라 차로 하겠습니다. | 이유를 덧붙이고 싶을 때 |
| I'm all set, thanks. | 충분합니다, 감사합니다. | 다시 권할 때 같은 톤으로 반복 |
몇 가지를 덧붙입니다. 대체 음료를 먼저 말하면 사양이 훨씬 매끄럽습니다. 아무것도 안 마시겠다고 하면 상대가 뭘 시켜야 할지 고민하지만, 탄산수를 시키겠다고 하면 그 자리에서 끝납니다.
또 하나. 한 번 사양했는데 다시 권하는 경우, 같은 문장을 같은 톤으로 반복하면 됩니다. 새로운 이유를 만들어 낼 필요가 없습니다. I'm all set, thanks를 웃으면서 두 번 말하는 것으로 거의 모든 상황이 정리됩니다. 대부분의 나라에서 이 이상 권하는 것은 실례로 여겨집니다.
반대 방향도 중요합니다. 상대에게 술을 권하지 않는 것이 기본입니다. 잔을 채워 주거나 같이 마시자고 청하는 것이 한국에서는 호의지만, 많은 나라에서는 부담이거나 무례입니다. 상대가 안 마시는 이유는 물어보지 않는 것이 예의입니다. 건강, 종교, 회복 중인 상태 등 물어서는 안 되는 이유일 수 있습니다.
일 얘기와 사적인 얘기의 경계
저녁 자리에서 일 얘기를 얼마나 해도 되는지는 회사와 나라와 사람에 따라 다릅니다. 규칙을 외우는 것보다 상대를 따라가는 편이 정확합니다. 상대가 일 얘기를 계속하면 계속하고, 화제를 돌리면 따라 돌리면 됩니다.
일 얘기를 접고 싶을 때 쓰는 표현이 있습니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Let's pick that up tomorrow. | 그 얘기는 내일 이어서 하죠. |
| Should we give it a rest for tonight? | 오늘은 여기까지 할까요? |
| I'll put that on the agenda for the morning. | 내일 아침 안건으로 올려 두겠습니다. |
| I'd rather not solve that over dinner. | 저녁 먹으면서 풀 문제는 아닌 것 같아요. |
talk shop이라는 표현도 자주 들립니다. 일 얘기를 한다는 뜻이고, Sorry, we're talking shop again처럼 스스로를 놀리는 데 씁니다.
화제 선택은 안전한 쪽과 위험한 쪽이 비교적 뚜렷합니다.
| 대체로 안전한 화제 | 대체로 피하는 화제 |
|---|---|
| 여행, 음식, 도시 추천 | 정치, 종교 |
| 스포츠, 취미, 주말 계획 | 연봉, 회사 내부 인사 |
| 일하게 된 경로, 커리어 이야기 | 나이, 결혼 여부, 자녀 계획 |
| 상대 도시의 볼거리 | 건강 상태, 체중 |
오른쪽 아래 항목은 특히 조심할 만합니다. 나이와 결혼 여부를 묻는 것은 한국에서 흔한 인사지만, 많은 서구권에서는 사적 영역에 대한 침범으로 받아들여집니다. 채용이나 평가와 관련된 맥락이면 법적 문제가 되는 나라도 있습니다. 상대가 먼저 가족 얘기를 꺼내면 그 화제로 들어가도 되지만, 내가 먼저 열지 않는 편이 안전합니다. 다만 이 경계의 위치도 나라와 개인차가 있으므로 하나의 규칙으로 단정하지는 않겠습니다.
대신 이 질문 하나면 거의 모든 자리가 채워집니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| What do you do when you're not working? | 일 안 할 때는 뭐 하세요? |
| How did you end up in this field? | 이 분야에는 어떻게 들어오셨어요? |
| Have you been with the company long? | 회사에 오래 계셨어요? |
| What's the best thing about living here? | 여기 살면서 제일 좋은 게 뭐예요? |
이동과 일정 조율
출장 일정은 거의 항상 바뀝니다. 바뀔 때 필요한 말은 몇 개 안 됩니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Where should I meet you? | 어디서 뵐까요? |
| Should I come to you, or is the lobby easier? | 제가 갈까요, 로비가 편하실까요? |
| Is it walkable from the hotel? | 호텔에서 걸어갈 만한가요? |
| How long does it usually take at that hour? | 그 시간대에 보통 얼마나 걸리나요? |
| I'll grab a cab. Anything I should tell the driver? | 택시 타고 갈게요. 기사에게 뭘 말하면 될까요? |
| I'm flexible. Whatever works for your team. | 저는 괜찮습니다, 팀 편한 대로 하시죠. |
| Would it help if we moved this to the morning? | 오전으로 옮기는 게 나을까요? |
가장 유용한 하나를 꼽으라면 시간 제약을 미리 알리는 문장입니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 | 왜 필요한가 |
|---|---|---|
| I have a hard stop at four. | 4시에는 반드시 일어나야 합니다. | 회의가 길어질 때 자르기 쉬움 |
| My flight's at seven, so I'd need to leave around four thirty. | 7시 비행기라 4시 반에는 나가야 합니다. | 이유까지 함께 |
| I can stay later if it helps, but I'd need to move my flight. | 더 있어도 되는데 비행기를 바꿔야 합니다. | 유연함과 대가를 함께 |
hard stop은 회의 문화에서 굳어진 표현으로, 협상 불가한 종료 시각이라는 뜻입니다. 회의 시작할 때 미리 말해 두면 중간에 끊고 나가는 게 훨씬 부드러워집니다. 끝날 무렵에 갑자기 일어나는 것보다 언제나 낫습니다.
문제가 생겼을 때
출장에서 사고는 예외가 아니라 기본값에 가깝습니다. 여기서 필요한 것은 유창함이 아니라 순서입니다. 사실을 말하고, 영향을 말하고, 무엇을 요청하는지 말합니다.
비행 지연과 결항
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| My flight's been delayed. I'll be landing around nine instead of three. | 항공편이 지연돼서 3시가 아니라 9시쯤 도착합니다. |
| I should still make tomorrow morning, but I'll have to miss dinner tonight. | 내일 오전은 괜찮은데 오늘 저녁은 못 갈 것 같습니다. |
| I'll keep you posted as I know more. | 상황 파악되는 대로 계속 알려 드리겠습니다. |
| Sorry for the short notice. | 급하게 알려 드려 죄송합니다. |
카운터에서는 이렇게 말합니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| I've been rebooked, but the connection doesn't work. | 재예약은 됐는데 환승이 안 맞습니다. |
| Is there anything earlier? | 더 이른 편은 없나요? |
| What are my options? | 어떤 방법이 있을까요? |
| Will you cover the hotel? | 호텔은 항공사에서 지원되나요? |
| Can you write down the flight number for me? | 편명을 적어 주실 수 있을까요? |
마지막 문장은 실전에서 대단히 유용합니다. 발음과 알파벳 때문에 항공편 정보를 잘못 알아듣는 사고가 많습니다. 적어 달라고 요청하는 것은 전혀 이상한 일이 아닙니다.
짐 분실
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| My bag didn't come out on the belt. | 짐이 안 나왔습니다. |
| Here's my baggage tag. | 수하물 태그입니다. |
| Do you know where it is now? | 지금 어디 있는지 아시나요? |
| Can it be delivered to my hotel? | 호텔로 배송해 주실 수 있나요? |
| Is there a compensation for essentials? | 생필품 보상이 되나요? |
| Who do I call if it doesn't arrive tomorrow? | 내일까지 안 오면 어디로 연락하면 되나요? |
다음 날 회의에서 복장이 어색할 수 있습니다. 가볍게 먼저 말해 두면 아무 문제가 없습니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Apologies for the outfit. My suitcase is still somewhere over the Atlantic. | 복장은 양해 부탁드립니다. 짐이 아직 대서양 어딘가에 있어서요. |
| My luggage didn't make it, so this is what I've got. | 짐이 도착을 안 해서 이대로 왔습니다. |
예약 오류
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| I have a confirmation, but it's not showing up on your side? | 예약 확인서가 있는데 그쪽에는 안 뜨나요? |
| Here's the email. It's for tonight, two nights. | 메일 여기 있습니다. 오늘부터 2박입니다. |
| I understand it's not your fault. What can we do? | 직원분 잘못이 아닌 건 압니다. 어떻게 하면 될까요? |
| Is there another property nearby you could move me to? | 근처 다른 지점으로 옮겨 주실 수 있을까요? |
세 번째 문장의 앞부분이 중요합니다. 문제를 처리해 줄 사람에게 화를 내지 않는다는 신호를 먼저 주면 해결 속도가 눈에 띄게 달라집니다. 이건 영어의 문제가 아니라 사람의 문제라 어디서나 같습니다.
마지막 인사와 후속 연락
돌아가기 전 마지막 대화는 짧고 따뜻하면 충분합니다.
| 표현 | 뜻 |
|---|---|
| Thanks again for having me. This was really useful. | 초대해 주셔서 다시 한번 감사합니다, 정말 유익했습니다. |
| It was great to finally meet in person. | 직접 뵙게 되어 정말 좋았습니다. |
| I'll send over the notes when I land. | 도착하면 정리해서 보내 드리겠습니다. |
| I'll follow up with the deck by Friday. | 금요일까지 자료 보내 드리겠습니다. |
| Let me know if you're ever in Seoul. | 서울 오실 일 있으면 알려 주세요. |
| Safe travels. | 조심히 가세요. |
Safe travels는 떠나는 사람에게 하는 인사이므로 방향에 주의합니다. 내가 떠나는 쪽이면 상대가 나에게 합니다.
돌아온 뒤 보내는 메일은 짧을수록 읽힙니다. 첫 문장에서 만난 장면을 상기시키고, 약속한 것을 이행하고, 다음 행동을 하나만 남깁니다.
Subject: Great meeting you in Munich
Hi Sarah,
It was great to finally meet in person last week.
As promised, here are the notes from Tuesday and the
updated timeline. The one open item is the data access
question - I have asked our security team and will come
back to you by Thursday.
Thanks again for making the time.
Best,
Youngju
As promised로 시작하는 문장이 후속 메일의 힘입니다. 약속한 것을 지켰다는 사실을 앞에 두면, 다음 요청의 무게가 달라집니다.
하지 않는 편이 나은 것들
교과서와 실제 출장 사이에 특히 간격이 큰 것들입니다.
과한 격식. 호텔 프런트에서 Dear Sir나 How do you do?를 쓰는 경우가 있는데 실제로는 거의 들리지 않습니다. Hi, I have a reservation under Kim 한 문장이면 충분합니다. 격식은 대체로 문장 길이가 아니라 태도로 전달됩니다.
반복되는 사과. Sorry를 문장마다 붙이면 정중해지는 게 아니라 불안해 보입니다. 주의를 끌 때는 Excuse me 한 번이면 됩니다. 다만 영국에서는 Sorry가 사과가 아니라 대화의 완충재로 훨씬 자주 쓰이므로, 영국 동료가 사과를 남발하는 것처럼 보여도 그건 사과가 아닙니다.
영어 실력에 대한 선제 사과를 반복하기. 처음 한 번 My English isn't great, so please stop me if I'm not clear 정도는 오히려 도움이 됩니다. 하지만 매번 반복하면 상대가 내용을 듣는 대신 나를 배려하는 데 신경을 쓰게 됩니다.
못 알아들었는데 끄덕이기. 출장에서 이건 위험합니다. 회의에서라면 나중에 확인하면 되지만, 게이트 번호나 픽업 시간을 잘못 알아들으면 그날 일정이 무너집니다. Sorry, one more time?이 언제나 쌉니다.
상대 이름을 안 쓰기. 영어권 비즈니스 대화에서는 이름을 부르는 빈도가 한국보다 높습니다. Thanks, Michael처럼 문장 끝에 이름을 붙이는 것만으로 거리감이 줄어듭니다.
모든 것을 미리 완벽하게 준비하려는 태도. 출장 영어의 실제 난도는 문장이 아니라 예측 불가능성에서 옵니다. 외운 표현의 개수는 그 앞에서 별로 힘을 못 씁니다.
실전 흐름: 출장 첫날
역할이 어떻게 바뀌는지 하루로 보면 이렇습니다.
[08:20 입국심사 - 낯선 사람]
심사관: Purpose of your visit?
나: Business meetings.
심사관: How long?
나: Five days. I have the return ticket here.
[09:40 호텔 - 낯선 사람]
나: Hi, I have a reservation under Kim.
직원: I am not seeing it...
나: Could you check under my first name as well?
Sometimes it gets entered the other way around.
[10:55 고객사 로비 - 손님으로 전환]
나: Hi, I am Youngju Kim from Acme, here to see Sarah at eleven.
Sarah: Youngju! Good to finally meet you.
나: Good to finally put a face to the name.
Thanks for having us.
[11:00 회의 전 5분 - 아직 손님]
Sarah: How was the flight?
나: Not too bad, about eleven hours. I slept most of it.
Have you been to Seoul?
Sarah: Once, years ago.
나: You should come back. The city changed a lot.
[11:05 회의 시작 - 전문가로 전환]
나: Before we start, I have a hard stop at four for my flight.
And I have got two things I would like to get to today.
[13:00 점심 - 손님으로 복귀]
나: What is good here?
Sarah: The fish is great.
나: I am allergic to shellfish - is there any in that?
It is an allergy, not a preference.
[19:30 저녁 - 손님, 일 얘기는 접음]
Sarah: Wine?
나: None for me, thanks. I will have a sparkling water.
Sarah: About the timeline we discussed-
나: Let us pick that up tomorrow. Tell me about the city instead.
[22:00 헤어질 때 - 마무리]
나: Thanks again for today. This was really useful.
I will send over the notes when I land.
한 문장도 길지 않습니다. 대신 네 번의 전환이 있습니다. 로비에서 손님이 되고, 회의실에서 전문가가 되고, 점심에서 다시 손님이 되고, 저녁에는 일 얘기를 접습니다.
오늘 바로 해볼 것
출장 전에 전부 준비할 수는 없습니다. 세 개만 자동화하세요.
- 문제 해결용 한 문장:
What are my options?— 항공사, 호텔, 렌터카, 식당 어디서나 그대로 씁니다. - 되묻는 한 문장:
Sorry, one more time?— 출장에서 가장 비싼 실수는 못 알아듣고 넘어가는 것입니다. - 사양하는 한 문장:
None for me, thanks.— 술, 음식, 추가 일정 전부에 씁니다.
그리고 출발 전에 한 번만 스스로 확인하세요. 내일 나는 몇 번 역할이 바뀌는가. 공항, 호텔, 로비, 회의실, 식당. 이 다섯 장면을 머릿속으로 미리 한 번 통과시켜 두면 실제로 그 자리에 섰을 때 훨씬 덜 얼어붙습니다.
이어서 읽기
- 상황이 없어도 영어가 느는 법 — 출장이 잡히기 전에 이 다섯 장면을 혼자 시뮬레이션하는 방법을 정리했습니다.
- 탁구 영어 스몰톡 완전 가이드 — 로비에서 기다리는 5분에 그대로 쓰는 스몰톡 구조.
- 섀도잉 연습 도구 — 위 표현들을 소리 내어 반복해 자동화합니다.
- 영어 회화 연습 — 역할이 바뀌는 상황을 대화로 돌려 볼 수 있습니다.
Business Trip English: Guest, Expert and Stranger Again, All Inside One Day
Introduction: it is not the words that stop you
Ask someone back from a business trip what was hardest and the answers rhyme. The meetings went fine somehow; it was everything around them. The airport, the hotel front desk, the five minutes waiting in a lobby, the dinner table — that is where nothing came out.
Which is strange. Meeting English uses far harder vocabulary, and yet the meeting works while the space outside it does not. The reason is not vocabulary. In a meeting it is clear who you are. You are the person who knows this subject, your reason for being in the room is obvious, and even the tone is decided for you.
The rest of a trip is not like that. Inside one day you become three different people. In front of the immigration desk you are a stranger waiting to be processed; in the client lobby you are a guest being hosted; the moment you walk into the meeting room you are an equal professional. And at the dinner table all three get mixed together.
This guide rests on one premise. Business trip English is hard not because you lack vocabulary but because the role keeps changing, and each role calls for a different register.
Three roles, three registers
In linguistics, register means the level of formality and the stance that shift with the situation. It is not a difficult idea. It is the thing that makes the same favour come out as different sentences depending on whether you are asking your manager or your younger sibling. On a trip, that switch happens several times a day, and in a hurry.
| Role | What I am to them | Register | Default stance | Typical failure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stranger | One more person to process | Short and clear, businesslike politeness | Put the request in one sentence | Explaining at far too much length |
| Guest | Someone being hosted | Warm, built mostly on thanks | Receive, thank, hand something back | Staying businesslike and coming across as cold |
| Professional | An equal colleague | Direct and concise | State your view plainly | Guest mode lingering, so no view gets stated |
As a stranger, shorter is better. The immigration officer, the hotel staff, the taxi driver are not interested in you, and that is normal. What they need is the information required to process you. Building longer sentences here makes the communication worse, not better.
As a guest, warmer is better. The other side made time, booked a room, arranged lunch. What this moment calls for is not an accurate sentence but a reaction with gratitude in it.
As a professional, plainer is better. Here clarity comes before politeness. Being vague does not read as consideration; it reads as not being prepared.
When the role changes and the register does not
Most of what actually goes wrong on a trip is not a failure to perform one of the roles. It is dragging the tone of a role that is already over into the next scene. It shows up in three shapes.
Carrying the guest register into the meeting room. The most common, and the most expensive. You walk in on the momentum of the welcome you got in the lobby, and whatever the other side says, you agree. You have an objection and do not raise it; the schedule is unreasonable and you say fine. That is the moment the ten-hour flight loses its purpose. Crossing the threshold of the meeting room, you have to switch from guest to colleague.
Carrying the professional register into the evening. You continue the afternoon's argument at the table. To you it is diligence; to them the day never ends. Dinner is usually not an extension of the work but a place for the relationship.
Carrying the stranger register into the first greeting. For a few hours at the airport and the hotel you have been speaking in short, businesslike lines, and you walk into the client lobby on the same rhythm. You say only what is necessary and you do not smile. Nobody thinks you are rude, but they do find you cold.
The signal that the role is changing is almost always the same. The place changes, or the number of people changes. Lobby to meeting room, meeting room to restaurant, restaurant to hotel. At each of those thresholds, update once who you are now. That single habit does more work than a hundred memorised phrases.
Stranger 1: immigration and the airport
One thing has to be clear before anything else. What you say at immigration has to be true. What is collected here is the shape of a short, clear, factual answer — not a technique for getting through inspection. Saying anything other than the truth is not an option under any circumstances, and in most countries it is itself a serious problem. What you prepare is not a way with words but documents. Keep the things that back up what you say — an invitation letter, booking confirmations, a return ticket — somewhere easy to reach.
On top of that, all you have to do is remove the unnecessary misunderstandings that come from the English itself. The officer's questions are mostly fixed, and the answers are allowed to be short.
| Question | The shape of a short answer |
|---|---|
| What is the purpose of your visit? | Business. / Business meetings. |
| How long will you be staying? | Five days. / Until the twelfth. |
| Where will you be staying? | At a hotel downtown. I have the booking here. |
| Who are you meeting? | Our partner company. I have the invitation letter. |
| Have you been here before? | Yes, last year. / No, this is my first time. |
| Do you have a return ticket? | Yes, I can show you. |
An answer that ends in one word or one phrase is normal. There is no need at all to build a longer sentence, and the longer it gets the higher the odds of an accident in pronunciation or grammar.
Asking again when you did not catch something is not strange in the slightest. An officer asks the same question hundreds of times a day and sees dozens of people ask for a repeat.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Sorry, could you repeat that? | Could you say that again? |
| Sorry, I didn't catch that. | I did not hear that. |
| Do you mean the hotel address? | Are you asking for the hotel address? |
| Let me check my itinerary. | Let me look at my schedule. |
| Can I show you the document? | May I show you the paperwork? |
What you do not know, say you do not know, and check the document. Let me check my itinerary is always better than guessing and giving a wrong answer.
Inside the airport the phrases get simpler still.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Is this the line for connecting flights? | Is this the right queue for connections? |
| Which terminal is gate 42 in? | Which terminal holds gate 42? |
| I have a tight connection. Can I go ahead? | My connection is close, may I go first? |
| Where can I get a SIM card? | Where do I buy a SIM? |
| Is there a shuttle to the city? | Is there a shuttle into town? |
In the UK a queue is a queue. Is this the queue for... is the natural form there, while the US uses line. Both sides understand each other, so it is not much of a problem.
Stranger 2: hotel check-in and room problems
The hotel front desk is where short sentences work best of all.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Hi, I have a reservation under Kim. | I booked under the name Kim. |
| Checking in, please. | I would like to check in. |
| Could I get a quiet room if there's one available? | A quiet room if one is free, please. |
| What time is breakfast? | When is breakfast served? |
| Is breakfast included? | Does the rate include breakfast? |
| What's the wifi password? | What is the wifi password? |
| Could I get a late checkout? | Is a late checkout possible? |
| Can I leave my bags here after checkout? | May I leave luggage here after checking out? |
Sometimes they cannot find the booking. Korean names are frequently entered into Western reservation systems with the family name and given name swapped. Knowing that and saying it first usually resolves it on the spot.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Could you check under my first name as well? | Would you also search by my given name? |
| Sometimes it gets entered the other way around. | The order gets reversed now and then. |
| Here's the confirmation number. | Here is the booking reference. |
When something is wrong with the room, stating the facts and the request without loading emotion into it is faster.
| Phrase | What it means | Tone |
|---|---|---|
| The room's quite noisy. Would it be possible to move? | The room is noisy, could I move? | Soft request |
| The air conditioning isn't working. | The air conditioning does not work. | Statement of fact |
| There's no hot water in my room. | There is no hot water in the room. | Statement of fact |
| I'd rather not stay in this room, to be honest. | Honestly, this room will not work for me. | One notch stronger |
| What are my options? | What can be done here? | Draws out a solution |
That last line may be the single most useful thing in this guide. Ask for the options instead of stating the complaint, and the conversation moves to the other person producing a solution. It works exactly the same at an airline counter, a car rental desk or a restaurant booking.
One thing that trips people up in hotels is floor numbering. In the UK and many other countries, the first floor is one flight up and the entrance level is the ground floor. In the US the first floor is the entrance level. Checking for the G or 0 button in the lift is the reliable move. The lift itself is an elevator in the US and a lift in the UK.
Guest 1: the first greeting at a client or branch office
Here the register changes. The short, businesslike tone has to be warmed up a little.
At reception you still keep it short.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Hi, I'm Youngju Kim from Acme. I'm here to see Sarah at ten. | I am Youngju Kim from Acme, here for a ten o'clock with Sarah. |
| I think she's expecting me. | She should be expecting me. |
| Should I wait here? | Is here the right place to wait? |
From the moment you meet your host, the temperature goes up.
| Phrase | What it means | When |
|---|---|---|
| Good to finally put a face to the name. | Good to meet you in person at last. | Someone you only worked with remotely |
| It's great to finally meet in person. | Lovely to finally meet face to face. | Same situation, a shade more formal |
| Thanks for having us. | Thank you for hosting us. | The visiting side's default greeting |
| Thanks for making the time. I know it's a busy week. | Thank you for making time in a busy week. | Right before the meeting starts |
| You have a nice office. | Your office is lovely. | While being walked through the building |
| Thanks for setting all this up. | Thank you for arranging all of this. | Thanks for the whole schedule |
put a face to the name is a settled expression for meeting in person someone you only knew as a name. It fits exactly the situation, now so common, of working through a screen for years before a first meeting.
Forms of address vary by country and by company. In most companies in the US, the UK and Australia, first names are used from the start. In German-speaking countries there are still cases where surname and title hold until the other person offers their first name, and in Japan a surname takes an honorific. Rather than a rule to memorise, one habit handles it. Copy exactly the way the other person introduces themselves. If they say I'm Michael, call them Michael; if they say I'm Dr. Weber, use that. Business card customs differ just as widely from country to country, so take one when it is offered and do not feel obliged to produce yours first.
From guest to professional: the five minutes before the meeting
There are a few minutes when you are sitting in the meeting room waiting for everyone to arrive. Many people find this the hardest part of all. There is nothing to do, the silence is awkward, and you have no idea what to say.
The questions that come up in this window are remarkably predictable.
| What they will ask | How you take it |
|---|---|
| How was the flight? | Not too bad, about eleven hours. I slept most of it. |
| Long trip? | Long enough. But the timing worked out fine. |
| First time here? | First time in Munich, yes. Second time in Germany. |
| How are you finding the city? | Really nice so far. I only saw it from the taxi though. |
| Are you over the jet lag? | Getting there. Ask me again after lunch. |
| Is the hotel okay? | Yes, it's close by, which helps. |
What Korean learners most often miss here is not the content of the answer but what comes after it. Answer and stop, and the other person has to keep manufacturing questions. Attach one piece and hand it back, and the conversation rolls on by itself.
| Question that hands it back | What it means |
|---|---|
| Have you been to Seoul? | Have you ever visited Seoul? |
| Do you travel much for work? | Do you travel a lot for work? |
| Have you been in this office long? | Have you been at this office long? |
| Anything I should see if I get a free morning? | Anything worth seeing if a morning frees up? |
There is a separate guide that covers this structure in more depth. English small talk for table tennis lays out the three beats of reacting, adding your own story and handing it back. In a business trip lobby that rhythm works exactly the same way.
And once the meeting starts, the register has to change. Marking that switch out loud makes it easier for you and for them.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Shall we get started? | Shall we begin? |
| Should we dive in? | Shall we get straight into it? |
| I've got a couple of things I'd like to get to today. | There are a few things I want to cover today. |
| Before we start, is there anything you want to add to the agenda? | Anything to add to the agenda before we begin? |
That last line is especially good for a visitor to use. It is the sentence that moves you naturally from guest to the person leading the meeting, without stopping being a guest.
Eating together
A meal is where the guest register comes back strongly. Two things, though, are exceptions that have to be said plainly: allergies and food you cannot eat.
Choosing from the menu
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Is there anything you'd recommend? | Would you recommend anything? |
| What's good here? | What is good here? |
| I'll have what you're having. | I will have the same as you. |
| I'm happy with anything. | Anything is fine with me. |
| Is this a lot of food or should I get two? | Is this a large portion, or should I order two? |
I'm happy with anything is polite, but it can also leave the other person doing the deciding. Once or twice is fine; used constantly it hands them the burden of every choice.
Allergies and food you cannot eat
Here clarity comes before politeness. Say it indirectly and it may never reach the kitchen, and the cost of that is high. This is not a cultural difference but a safety matter, so saying it directly is right in any country.
| Phrase | What it means | Why this shape |
|---|---|---|
| I'm allergic to shellfish. Does this have any? | I have a shellfish allergy, is there any in this? | States the allergy up front |
| It's an allergy, not a preference. | This is an allergy, not a preference. | Makes the kitchen take it seriously |
| Could you check with the kitchen? | Would you check with the kitchen? | When the server looks unsure |
| I can't eat pork. Is there something else on here? | I cannot eat pork, is there another option? | Religion or diet |
| I'm vegetarian, but I eat fish. | I am vegetarian but do eat fish. | States the boundary first |
| Nothing too spicy for me, if that's okay. | Nothing too spicy for me, please. | Preferences stay soft |
It's an allergy, not a preference is a sentence people with allergies genuinely use. It signals that this needs separating from a taste request, and in most restaurants the attitude changes immediately.
Paying
Who pays varies by country and by company. The inviting side often covers it, but plenty of places require everyone to expense their own, and some have entertainment rules strict enough that they cannot accept anything at all. Proposing rather than assuming is the safer form.
| Phrase | What it means | Situation |
|---|---|---|
| Let me get this one. | I will take this one. | Offering first |
| Please, you're our guest. | Please, you are our guest. | When you are the host |
| Thank you. Next one's on me. | Thank you, the next one is on me. | Accepting after declining once |
| Should we split it? | Shall we split the bill? | Between equals |
| Our policy is that we cover our own. I hope that's okay. | Our policy is that we pay our own way. | When it is a company rule |
That last one is the one you actually need most often. Framing it as policy turns it from refusing someone's kindness into sharing a constraint, and nobody ends up uncomfortable.
Tipping is also completely different from country to country. In the US a tip is generally a baseline expectation; in a number of European countries a service charge is included or rounding up a small amount is the end of it; and in Japan tipping is not a custom at all. It varies between countries even within Europe, so it is better not to generalise. When you need to know, asking a local colleague is the fastest route.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Is tipping expected here? | Is tipping normal here? |
| Is service included? | Is a service charge included? |
| How much do people usually leave? | How much do people usually leave? |
What you call the bill splits too. check is usual in the US, bill in the UK. Both Could we get the check? and Could we get the bill? are understood everywhere.
The evening: declining a drink, and where the topics stop
Declining alcohol politely
This comes up often enough to deserve a section of its own. And to give the conclusion first: in most Western business settings, declining a drink needs no explanation. You do not owe anyone a reason.
| Phrase | What it means | Tone |
|---|---|---|
| None for me, thanks. | Not for me, thank you. | Safest, no explanation |
| I'm good, thanks. | I am fine, thanks. | Casual, also for refusing a refill |
| Just water for me. | Water for me, please. | Natural and short |
| I'll have a sparkling water. | I will take a sparkling water. | Names a replacement drink first |
| I don't drink, but please go ahead. | I do not drink, but please do. | Stating it plainly |
| I've got an early flight, so I'll stick to tea. | Early flight, so I will stay on tea. | When you want to add a reason |
| I'm all set, thanks. | I am all set, thank you. | Repeat in the same tone if offered again |
A few notes. Naming a replacement drink makes the refusal far smoother. Say you will not drink anything and the other person is left wondering what to order for you; say you will have a sparkling water and it is finished on the spot.
One more. If you decline once and they offer again, repeat the same sentence in the same tone. There is no need to invent a new reason. Saying I'm all set, thanks twice, with a smile, settles almost every situation. In most countries, pressing further than that is considered rude.
The reverse direction matters just as much. The default is that you do not push drinks on anyone else. Filling someone's glass or inviting them to drink along with you reads as warmth in Korea, but in many countries it is a burden or a rudeness. And not asking why someone is not drinking is the courtesy. The reason may be health, religion or being in recovery — reasons nobody should be asked about.
Where work talk stops and private life begins
How much work talk is acceptable over dinner depends on the company, the country and the person. Following the other person is more accurate than memorising a rule. If they keep talking about work, keep going; if they change the subject, follow them across.
There are phrases for closing the work talk down.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Let's pick that up tomorrow. | Let us continue that tomorrow. |
| Should we give it a rest for tonight? | Shall we leave it there for tonight? |
| I'll put that on the agenda for the morning. | I will put it on tomorrow morning's agenda. |
| I'd rather not solve that over dinner. | That is not a problem to solve over dinner. |
You will also hear talk shop a lot. It means talking about work, and it is used to tease yourself, as in Sorry, we're talking shop again.
Topic selection has a fairly clear safe side and risky side.
| Usually safe topics | Usually avoided topics |
|---|---|
| Travel, food, city recommendations | Politics, religion |
| Sport, hobbies, weekend plans | Salary, internal personnel matters |
| How you ended up in this work, career stories | Age, marital status, plans for children |
| What to see in their city | Health, weight |
The bottom right entries are worth particular care. Asking about age and marital status is a common greeting in Korea, but in much of the West it is received as an intrusion into private territory. In contexts connected to hiring or evaluation, in some countries it becomes a legal problem. If the other person brings up family first you can follow them into it, but it is safer not to open that door yourself. That said, the position of this boundary also varies by country and by individual, so I will not state it as a single rule.
One question, on the other hand, fills almost any table on its own.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| What do you do when you're not working? | What do you do outside work? |
| How did you end up in this field? | How did you get into this field? |
| Have you been with the company long? | Have you been at the company long? |
| What's the best thing about living here? | What is the best thing about living here? |
Getting around and adjusting the schedule
A trip schedule almost always changes. What you need when it does is only a handful of lines.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Where should I meet you? | Where shall we meet? |
| Should I come to you, or is the lobby easier? | Shall I come to you, or is the lobby easier? |
| Is it walkable from the hotel? | Can I walk it from the hotel? |
| How long does it usually take at that hour? | How long does that usually take at that time of day? |
| I'll grab a cab. Anything I should tell the driver? | I will take a taxi. Anything to tell the driver? |
| I'm flexible. Whatever works for your team. | I am flexible, whatever suits your team. |
| Would it help if we moved this to the morning? | Would moving it to the morning help? |
If you had to pick the most useful one, it is the sentence that flags a time constraint in advance.
| Phrase | What it means | Why you need it |
|---|---|---|
| I have a hard stop at four. | I have to be up and out at four. | Easy to cut off a meeting that runs long |
| My flight's at seven, so I'd need to leave around four thirty. | My flight is at seven, so I need to leave around half four. | Reason attached |
| I can stay later if it helps, but I'd need to move my flight. | I can stay longer, but I would have to change my flight. | Flexibility and its cost together |
hard stop is settled meeting vocabulary meaning a non-negotiable finish time. Say it at the start of the meeting and cutting out partway through becomes far smoother. It is always better than standing up suddenly as things wind down.
When something goes wrong
On a trip, an incident is closer to the default than to an exception. What you need here is not fluency but order. State the fact, state the impact, state what you are asking for.
Delays and cancellations
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| My flight's been delayed. I'll be landing around nine instead of three. | My flight is delayed; I land around nine, not three. |
| I should still make tomorrow morning, but I'll have to miss dinner tonight. | Tomorrow morning is fine, but I will miss tonight's dinner. |
| I'll keep you posted as I know more. | I will keep updating you as I learn more. |
| Sorry for the short notice. | Sorry for the late notice. |
At the counter, it goes like this.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| I've been rebooked, but the connection doesn't work. | I have been rebooked but the connection does not work. |
| Is there anything earlier? | Is there an earlier option? |
| What are my options? | What can be done here? |
| Will you cover the hotel? | Does the airline cover the hotel? |
| Can you write down the flight number for me? | Could you write the flight number down for me? |
That last one is enormously useful in practice. Flight details get misheard all the time thanks to pronunciation and letters. Asking for it in writing is not strange at all.
Lost luggage
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| My bag didn't come out on the belt. | My bag never came out on the belt. |
| Here's my baggage tag. | Here is my baggage tag. |
| Do you know where it is now? | Do you know where it is right now? |
| Can it be delivered to my hotel? | Could it be delivered to my hotel? |
| Is there a compensation for essentials? | Is there any compensation for essentials? |
| Who do I call if it doesn't arrive tomorrow? | Who do I call if it has not arrived by tomorrow? |
Your clothes may be awkward at the next day's meeting. Mentioning it lightly up front removes the problem entirely.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Apologies for the outfit. My suitcase is still somewhere over the Atlantic. | Sorry about the clothes, my suitcase is still over the Atlantic. |
| My luggage didn't make it, so this is what I've got. | My luggage did not arrive, so this is what I have. |
Booking errors
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| I have a confirmation, but it's not showing up on your side? | I have a confirmation, but it is not showing on your system? |
| Here's the email. It's for tonight, two nights. | Here is the email. Tonight, two nights. |
| I understand it's not your fault. What can we do? | I know this is not your fault. What can we do? |
| Is there another property nearby you could move me to? | Could you move me to another property nearby? |
The first half of that third sentence is the important part. Signal up front that you are not going to be angry at the person who has to fix it, and the speed of the fix changes visibly. This is not an English problem but a people problem, so it holds everywhere.
The last goodbye and the follow-up
The last conversation before you head home only needs to be short and warm.
| Phrase | What it means |
|---|---|
| Thanks again for having me. This was really useful. | Thank you again for hosting me, this was genuinely useful. |
| It was great to finally meet in person. | It was great to finally meet face to face. |
| I'll send over the notes when I land. | I will send the notes once I land. |
| I'll follow up with the deck by Friday. | I will send the deck through by Friday. |
| Let me know if you're ever in Seoul. | Let me know if you are ever in Seoul. |
| Safe travels. | Have a safe trip. |
Safe travels is said to the person who is leaving, so watch the direction. If you are the one departing, they say it to you.
The email you send once you are back gets read in proportion to how short it is. Remind them of the scene in the first line, deliver what you promised, and leave exactly one next action.
Subject: Great meeting you in Munich
Hi Sarah,
It was great to finally meet in person last week.
As promised, here are the notes from Tuesday and the
updated timeline. The one open item is the data access
question - I have asked our security team and will come
back to you by Thursday.
Thanks again for making the time.
Best,
Youngju
The sentence beginning As promised is where a follow-up email gets its power. Put the fact that you kept your word at the front and the weight of your next request changes.
Things better left undone
These are the places where the textbook and an actual business trip diverge most.
Excessive formality. People reach for Dear Sir or How do you do? at a hotel desk, and in reality those are almost never heard. One sentence — Hi, I have a reservation under Kim — is enough. Formality is mostly carried by manner, not by sentence length.
Repeated apologies. Attach Sorry to every sentence and you do not sound polite, you sound anxious. To get someone's attention, one Excuse me does it. That said, in the UK Sorry is used far more often as conversational padding than as an apology, so when a British colleague seems to be apologising constantly, they are not.
Apologising for your English again and again. Once, something like My English isn't great, so please stop me if I'm not clear, actually helps. Repeat it every time and the other person starts spending attention on looking after you instead of on what you are saying.
Nodding when you did not catch it. On a trip this is dangerous. In a meeting you can check later, but mishear a gate number or a pickup time and the day collapses. Sorry, one more time? is always cheap.
Not using the other person's name. English-speaking business conversation uses names more often than Korean does. Simply attaching one to the end of a sentence, as in Thanks, Michael, closes distance.
Trying to prepare everything perfectly in advance. The real difficulty of business trip English comes from unpredictability, not from sentences. The number of phrases you memorised does not do much against that.
A worked example: day one of a trip
Here is how the roles change across a single day.
[08:20 immigration - stranger]
Officer: Purpose of your visit?
Me: Business meetings.
Officer: How long?
Me: Five days. I have the return ticket here.
[09:40 hotel - stranger]
Me: Hi, I have a reservation under Kim.
Clerk: I am not seeing it...
Me: Could you check under my first name as well?
Sometimes it gets entered the other way around.
[10:55 client lobby - switching to guest]
Me: Hi, I am Youngju Kim from Acme, here to see Sarah at eleven.
Sarah: Youngju! Good to finally meet you.
Me: Good to finally put a face to the name.
Thanks for having us.
[11:00 five minutes before the meeting - still a guest]
Sarah: How was the flight?
Me: Not too bad, about eleven hours. I slept most of it.
Have you been to Seoul?
Sarah: Once, years ago.
Me: You should come back. The city changed a lot.
[11:05 meeting starts - switching to professional]
Me: Before we start, I have a hard stop at four for my flight.
And I have got two things I would like to get to today.
[13:00 lunch - back to guest]
Me: What is good here?
Sarah: The fish is great.
Me: I am allergic to shellfish - is there any in that?
It is an allergy, not a preference.
[19:30 dinner - guest, work talk set aside]
Sarah: Wine?
Me: None for me, thanks. I will have a sparkling water.
Sarah: About the timeline we discussed-
Me: Let us pick that up tomorrow. Tell me about the city instead.
[22:00 saying goodnight - wrapping up]
Me: Thanks again for today. This was really useful.
I will send over the notes when I land.
Not one sentence in it is long. What it has instead is four switches. Guest in the lobby, professional in the meeting room, guest again at lunch, and work talk folded away at dinner.
Try this today
You cannot prepare everything before a trip. Automate three things only.
- One sentence for solving problems:
What are my options?— it works unchanged at an airline, a hotel, a car rental desk or a restaurant. - One sentence for asking again:
Sorry, one more time?— the most expensive mistake on a trip is letting something you did not catch go past. - One sentence for declining:
None for me, thanks.— it covers drinks, food and extra items on the schedule.
And check one thing with yourself before you leave. How many times does my role change tomorrow? Airport, hotel, lobby, meeting room, restaurant. Walk through those five scenes once in your head beforehand and you freeze far less when you are actually standing in them.
Read next
- How to Improve Your English Without the Situation — how to simulate these five scenes alone, before a trip is even booked.
- English small talk for table tennis — the small talk structure you use unchanged during those five minutes in the lobby.
- Shadowing Practice Tool — repeat the phrases above out loud until they are automatic.
- Conversation Lab — run the situations where the role changes as actual conversations.