Skip to content
Published on

The Industrial Revolution — The Great Transformation That Remade Human Life

🇰🇷KO🇺🇸EN🇯🇵JA
Split View필사 모드
Authors

Opening — A World That Barely Changed for a Thousand Years

Let me begin with a single question.

If you had been a farmer in the year 1000, how different would the world your great-grandfather lived in have been from the world your great-grandchildren would come to live in?

Astonishingly, they would have been nearly the same.

People plowed the same fields with the same wooden plows, rose when the sun came up and slept when it went down. The great majority never traveled more than a few dozen kilometers from the village where they were born, not once in their whole lives.

For hundreds of years, the fastest a human being could move was the speed of a galloping horse. This was as true for Julius Caesar as for Genghis Khan or an eighteenth-century mail coach. For fifteen hundred years, humanity top speed had, in essence, stood still.

And then, sometime around 1760 to 1840, something happened in the coal mines and cotton mills of central England.

And that something suddenly began to fast-forward humanity clock, which had stood nearly frozen for thousands of years.

Within a single generation, people rode trains at fifty kilometers an hour. They worked in factories that stayed bright into the night, and they wore clothes made in cities they had never once visited.

This essay is a story about that vast shift, the Industrial Revolution.

We will look, in a balanced way, at how it began, what it made possible and what it broke, and what shadow and what light it casts at once over our lives today.

Why Britain, and Why Then?

There is a question historians have long thrown out.

China was the place that first invented gunpowder, the compass, and paper. India and the Islamic world boasted exquisite craft industries and vast trade networks. So why did the Industrial Revolution first explode in eighteenth-century Britain, a comparatively small island nation?

There is no single cause. It is closer to the result of many conditions gathering in one place.

Abundant Coal and Iron

Britain had high-quality coal buried close to the surface.

As timber grew scarce, people burned coal. And the need for machines to pump water out of deep mines became urgent. That urgency would later spur the invention of the steam engine.

A Structure of Expensive Labor and Cheap Energy

At the time, the wages of labor in Britain were relatively high. Conversely, the price of coal was low.

So the calculation that "replacing people with machines pays off" held earlier there than elsewhere. The environment in which inventions could turn into money was already in place.

Changes in Agriculture

Crop rotation and enclosure raised food production.

Fewer farmers could now feed more people. As a result, the rural population that had lost its work flowed into the cities, and these people became the labor force of the factories.

Capital and Institutions

Relatively secure property rights, developed banking and insurance, and a patent system encouraged investment in invention.

The belief that a person with a good idea could be rewarded for that idea called forth still more inventions.

Vast Markets and Colonies

A huge trade network for buying and selling raw materials like cotton and finished goods was already laid out.

Here the last item should not simply be passed over.

The cotton that became the fuel of British industrialization came in large part from plantations that leaned on enslaved labor. Behind the glamorous factory chimneys of the Industrial Revolution stood, together, the dark shadow of forced labor across the Atlantic. This is a fact we must remember.

Steam, Factories, and Cotton — The Three Pillars of Change

The Steam Engine — Humanity First Grasps an Unlimited Force

Until then, almost all the power humanity could use came from human muscle, livestock, water wheels, and windmills.

All of them were forces at the mercy of nature whims. When the river ran dry, the water wheel stopped. When the wind did not blow, the windmill was useless.

Thomas Newcomen built a steam engine for draining mines in the early eighteenth century. And James Watt greatly improved it from the late 1760s onward.

The heart of what Watt did was twofold. First, he placed a separate condenser to greatly reduce wasted heat. Second, he converted back-and-forth motion into rotary motion, so that every machine in a factory could be turned.

Now humanity could create enormous power anytime and anywhere, even far from a riverbank and even when no wind blew, so long as there was coal.

Here is one interesting fact. The reason we still express engine power in horsepower today comes from Watt. He devised the unit to show miners persuasively how many horses his machine was worth.

The Factory — The Very Way of Working Changes

Perhaps even more fundamental than the steam engine was the emergence of the workplace called the factory.

Before that, cloth was made through cottage industry. Farming families spun the wheel and worked the loom at home. At their own pace, to their own rhythm.

The factory changed all of this.

People came to work at a set hour and labored to the beat of the machine. For the first time in human history, "labor sold by the hour" became widespread.

The clock hung on the factory wall and the bell that announced arrival and departure replaced the "time of sunrise and sunset" of agrarian society with "time set by the boss." The human sense of time itself had changed.

The Cotton Industry — The Starting Point of Everything

The first spark of the Industrial Revolution flew from the cotton industry.

As the spinning machine and the power loom were invented one after another, productivity rose explosively. Thread that took days to spin by hand the machine drew out in a matter of hours.

As a result, the price of clothing fell dramatically. For the first time in history, ordinary people too could own several sets of clean clothes. In terms of hygiene and self-respect alike, this was no small change.

Urbanization — People Crowd into One Place

Where factories gathered, people gathered.

A city like Manchester swelled, in less than a century, from a small town into an enormous city of hundreds of thousands.

The scale of this change becomes sharper when seen in numbers. It took humanity thousands of years for a society to tip its center of gravity from the countryside to the city, yet in the industrialized nations that happened in just a few generations.

Rough change in the share of urban population (a conceptual comparison)

Pre-industrial society   ▓░░░░░░░░░  Most live in the countryside
Industrializing phase    ▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░  Rapid movement into cities
Mature industrial era    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░  A majority live in cities

* The bars above are a conceptual sketch meant to show the trend, not figures for a specific year.

But this explosive growth was unprepared growth.

Water and sewage, housing, and sanitary facilities could not keep up with the population increase at all. Workers' families lived packed into cramped single rooms that the sun never reached. They drew drinking water beside alleys where filth flowed.

Epidemics like cholera and typhoid swept through the cities periodically.

Paradoxically, this dreadful state of sanitation became the occasion that later gave birth to a new discipline and institution: public health.

The epidemiological research of the mid-nineteenth century, which revealed that a contaminated well was the cause of cholera, was a symbolic scene of the process by which the city itself worked to solve the problems the city had created. The problem was, in fact, also the mother of a new solution.

Light and Shadow — Did Living Standards Really Improve?

This is one of the most heated scholarly debates surrounding the Industrial Revolution.

Did the workers of early industrialization come to live better, or to live worse?

There is no single fixed answer to this question. Scholars' positions divide broadly into two.

ViewCore claimWhat it points to
OptimistIn the long run, living standards roseRising wages, cheap manufactured goods, longer life expectancy
PessimistAt least early on, quality of life worsenedPoor sanitation, long working hours, deteriorating urban environment

The intriguing point is that both camps may not be wrong.

The average wage in the statistics may have risen. But the felt quality of life for someone working fourteen hours a day in a soot-filled city may actually have grown worse.

This debate shows well that a single number called "the average" cannot fully contain the complex experience of the people who lived through an era.

What is clear is that, seen over the long run, industrialization pulled humanity out of the "Malthusian trap."

There was an age-old cycle in which, as the population grew, food fell short and the population shrank again. An explosively expanded productive power broke that cycle. Most of the material foundation for the abundance we enjoy today was laid in this period.

Labor, Children, and the Environment — Who Paid the Price?

The Dark Scene of Child Labor

The most tragic scene of the early factory was the labor of small children.

On the grounds that their small bodies made them suited to crawling beneath machines to clean them, children of six or seven worked all day long beside dangerous machinery.

This is not something to be seen merely as the cruelty of one era.

Here an important historical lesson emerges. The point is that social outrage at this misery ultimately produced change.

Over the course of the nineteenth century, Britain enacted a series of factory acts limiting the working hours and ages of children. Labor unions were formed, the franchise gradually widened, and compulsory education was introduced.

Many of the rights we take for granted today are the result wrought by the suffering and resistance of these factory workers. This history reminds us that rights were not given for free but won through struggle.

Broken Machines — The Cry of the Luddites

Some of the skilled workers whose jobs were taken by machines broke into factories in the dead of night and smashed the machines.

The actions of these people, called Luddites, are often used today to mock "anyone who blindly rejects technological progress."

But their real protest was not against the machine itself.

What angered them was the way the technology was introduced. It was the reality in which its benefits flowed to only a few, and no safety net whatsoever was given to the people who had lost their jobs.

In this respect, the cry of the Luddites poses a question worth chewing over even today. In an age in which artificial intelligence and automation are transforming jobs, the question is whose benefits and whose costs we are weighing together.

The Sky Turns Black

The Industrial Revolution was also the starting point at which humanity began burning fossil fuels in earnest.

The skies over the cities were stained black with coal smoke. The rivers were polluted with factory effluent.

There is one fascinating case.

A certain species of moth in Britain was originally mostly light in color. But when industrial-era soot blackened the bark of trees, the dark moths became less visible to predators and thus more likely to survive.

As a result, the proportion of dark moths around the cities rose sharply. This is often cited as a textbook example showing the effect of environmental change on the evolution of living things.

Soot made by humans had, in effect, shifted even the direction of natural selection. How deep a mark we leave on the environment is something a single small moth bears witness to.

From the First to the Fourth — A Wave That Will Not Stop

When we say "Industrial Revolution," we usually picture the steam-powered First Industrial Revolution. But the change did not stop there.

Historians often explain the great leaps that followed by dividing them into stages.

Stages of the Industrial Revolution (a widely used division)

First   Steam and machinery        Mechanizing production with the power of water and steam
Second  Electricity, mass production   Electricity, the conveyor belt, the mass-production system
Third   Computers and automation   Electronics, information and communication, digitization
Fourth  Connection and intelligence   AI, the Internet of Things, data-driven automation

* The division into stages is a conceptual frame whose emphases may differ from scholar to scholar.

There is one current that runs through all these stages.

It is that humanity has handed over, more and more, the work it once "did with the body" to machines and systems.

If the First Revolution replaced human muscle, the change of the era we now live in can also be seen as an attempt to hand over even some of human "judgment" and "cognition" to machines.

So studying the history of the Industrial Revolution is not merely an old tale.

Each time a new technology appears, it is a two-hundred-year-old yet still vivid textbook on who gains and who pays the cost, and on what institutions and safety nets a society must build between them to keep its balance.

Small Anecdotes — Everyday Scenes the Machine Age Changed

Let me step away from the grand discourse for a moment.

I have gathered a few small scenes that show how the Industrial Revolution changed the daily lives of ordinary people.

The Birth of Standard Time

Before the train appeared, each city kept its own time.

Being off by a few minutes from the next town was no flaw. It was enough to take the moment the sun stood highest as noon.

But to match train timetables, everyone had to use the same time. So the railway companies pushed standard time, and the concept of the "time zone" we use today took hold.

Christmas Cards and Holidays

Cheap printing and postage, and train travel, became possible.

With that, the customs of sending cards to family living far away and heading off to the seaside in holiday season became popular in this period. The very concept of leisure was opened to more people.

The Invention Called the Weekend

The weekend we take for granted was not given by nature either.

It is a comparatively modern institution that gradually took hold as a product of the struggle to shorten working hours. Behind the Saturday and Sunday on which we rest are hidden the negotiations and battles of countless people.

These seemingly trivial changes gathered together to create a new kind of human being, the one we call "modern."

The Chain of Invention — One Begets the Next

As you study the Industrial Revolution, one interesting pattern comes into view.

Invention was not the flash of an isolated genius. Rather, it was closer to a chain in which one invention created the need for another, and that need called forth yet the next invention.

Let me take the cotton industry as an example.

First came a machine that wove cloth quickly. Then the thread to weave the cloth began to run short. The supply of thread could not keep up with the speed of weaving.

This "thread shortage" problem spurred the invention of the spinning machine that spun thread quickly. But this time, when thread came pouring out in such quantity, a faster loom that could weave it all became necessary again.

In this way, weaving and spinning developed together, each running ahead of and behind the other in turn.

The chain in which invention calls forth invention (a conceptual flow)

Fast loom        ─▶  Thread runs short
Thread shortage  ─▶  Fast spinning machine appears
Thread overflows ─▶  An even faster loom is needed
More factory machines ─▶  Demand for powerful energy (the steam engine)
Steam engine spreads  ─▶  Coal demand soars, deeper mines
Deep mines       ─▶  Drainage and haulage technology advances, linked by rail

* The diagram above is a conceptual flow that simplifies the actual historical sequence.

Here we gain an important insight.

The progress of technology does not leap out as a finished product from any one person head. It is closer to an enormous gear turning as the problems and answers thrown out by countless people mesh with one another.

When we remember the name of a single famous inventor today, it is closer to the truth to also recall that behind that name lay countless improvements and attempts that vanished without a name.

A Thought Experiment — Two Worlds Seen by a Time Traveler

Let me give my imagination free rein for a moment.

Suppose there is a time traveler. He spends one day in a rural English village in 1700, and one day in an English industrial city in 1850.

On the morning of 1700, he wakes to the crowing of a rooster. Water is drawn from the well. Bread is baked at home, and his clothes are woven from thread his mother spun on the wheel. He knows the names and faces of most of the people in the village. The number of people he will meet in his whole life does not exceed a few hundred.

When the sun sets, the world sinks into almost complete darkness. Candles are expensive, so they are used sparingly. The rhythm of the day is set by the sun.

Now he goes to the industrial city of 1850.

The morning begins not with a rooster but with the factory siren. Gas lamps light the streets, and people hurry past one another among unfamiliar faces. The clothes he wears are the product of a distant factory, made by someone he cannot know.

At the train station, a train bound for a city he has never visited departs at an exact time. Even at night, the factory lights do not go out. The rhythm of the day is now set not by the sun but by the clock and the machine.

The same country, a difference of only 150 years.

And yet the distance between the two worlds seems far greater than the distance opened up over the thousand years before it.

What this thought experiment shows is simple. The Industrial Revolution changed not merely the way things were made. It changed the very way a person feels time, the way one forms relationships with strangers, and the way one understands one own life.

Food for Thought — A Short Quiz

As you gather up what you have read, try answering for yourself. The answers are in the text.

  1. Recall three or more of the conditions the essay cites as the background for why the Industrial Revolution happened first in eighteenth-century Britain.

  2. Why do optimists and pessimists divide over the living standards of early industrial workers, and what does it mean to say both positions can be right at once?

  3. If the protest of the Luddites was not a simple rejection of machines, what was the thing they really took issue with? How might you connect this to today debates over automation?

Correcting Common Myths

There are a few widely spread misunderstandings surrounding the Industrial Revolution. Let me set them down closer to the facts.

Myth 1 — "A Single Genius Invented the Steam Engine"

The steam engine is not the solitary invention of any one person.

It is the result of the attempts and improvements of many people piling up over a long time. It is true that Watt improvement was decisive, but he too stood on the work of those who came before him.

Myth 2 — "The Industrial Revolution Happened Overnight"

Because of the word "revolution," it is easy to picture a sudden explosion.

But in reality it was a change that proceeded gradually over decades, and seen broadly, over more than a century. Many of the people living through it did not clearly know that they stood in the midst of a vast transformation.

Myth 3 — "Machines Unconditionally Made Everyone Poor"

This is a half-truth.

The skilled workers of certain trades were clearly hit hard. But new jobs also arose together, and over the long run total productive power increased by leaps. The crux was "who" lost out and "who" gained, and how society handled the gap between them.

Once we clear away the misunderstandings, a more interesting truth comes to light. The Industrial Revolution was not a simple drama of good and evil, but a complex process in which the choices, accidents, and conflicts of countless people were entangled.

Closing — An Eye That Sees Light and Shadow Together

The Industrial Revolution brought humanity unprecedented abundance.

A life freed from starvation, dressed in cheap clothing, able to travel far, and lived longer. The material foundation of all this was laid then.

At the same time, it pushed small children into factories, fouled rivers and skies, and shook some people lives to the very root.

That light and that shadow were not separate events but two sides of the same coin.

Perhaps the greatest lesson the Industrial Revolution gives us may be this.

Technology itself is neither good nor evil. Depending on the institutions and values upon which we place it, it becomes liberation for some and suffering for others.

This is precisely why we, standing today before a new wave of technology, must look once more into that valley of two hundred years ago.

History does not repeat, but it often flows to the same rhyme.

The hope and the fear that people held before the steam engine may not be so different from the feelings in our own hearts as we stand today before artificial intelligence.

Examining what people did well then and what they missed is, in the end, the oldest yet most reliable well of wisdom for us to make better choices now.

References

Discuss on Twitter • View on GitHub