Skip to content
Published on

The Black Death — How Death Remade the World

🇰🇷KO🇺🇸EN🇯🇵JA
Split View필사 모드
Authors

Opening — When Spring Came, No One Was Left to Ring the Bell

In the mid-fourteenth century, a monk is said to have written these words on parchment. So many had died, he wrote, that not even anyone remained to ring the bell for the dead.

He left a blank margin behind, hoping that someone in the future might one day read his words. It came together with a foreboding that he himself, too, might soon die.

What swept the age in which he lived was precisely the Black Death, the great outbreak of plague. From around 1347, within the span of a few years, this pestilence carried off a large portion of Europe's population.

The exact figures differ from source to source. Still, many historians estimate that roughly a third of Europe's population, give or take, vanished. Some cities lost more than half of their inhabitants.

Numbers alone may not land with full weight. But suppose we imagine it this way. One morning you wake, and one out of every three people you knew has disappeared from the world within a few months. Family, neighbors, colleagues, even the keeper of the shop you frequented. A loss of that scale fell within a single generation, and within only a handful of years at that.

This essay is the story of that vast death. Yet it will not linger merely on how many people died.

The more fascinating and more important question is this. After this overwhelming death had ended, how did the world of the survivors change? How did death bend the very direction of history?

In what follows, we will trace a few paths in turn.

First we look at what this disease actually was, at how invisible bacteria and fleas and rats formed a chain of death. Then we examine how that disease shook the beliefs and order of the Middle Ages, and how the lives of the survivors were altered.

Finally, we will set straight the common misconceptions that surround the Black Death, and think together about what questions this ancient tragedy poses to us today. It is a story from seven hundred years ago, yet within it lie questions that are not at all unfamiliar to us now.

What Is Plague? — The Identity of an Invisible Enemy

Today we understand the identity of the Black Death relatively well. Plague is a disease caused chiefly by a bacterium known as the plague bacillus.

This bacterium is thought to have been carried to humans mainly through fleas that live on rodents such as rats. A flea sucks the blood of an infected rat, and when that flea then bites a person, the bacterium spreads. That is the structure of it.

Plague appears in several forms.

  • Bubonic plague: The lymph nodes in the groin or armpit swell up large and dark. The widely known account holds that the name Black Death later arose from these dark swellings.
  • Pneumonic plague: A form that invades the lungs. Because it can spread directly between people through coughing and droplets, it is thought to have been even faster and more lethal.

People of the time had no idea whatsoever that bacteria existed. It was an age without microscopes and without germ theory.

So people tried to explain the cause in their own ways. Some said it was due to an ominous alignment of the stars; others believed that bad air, or miasma, carried the disease.

Sadly, some singled out particular groups as scapegoats and persecuted them. How easily fear of an unknown cause can spill over into violence against the innocent, this period shows us with painful clarity.

The Invisible Chain — Bacteria, Fleas, Rats, and Humans

If we peer a little more closely at the biological identity of the Black Death, it helps us understand why this disease spread so cruelly and so fast. Even without difficult medical terms, the principle can be sketched well enough.

The heart of it is the chain of transmission. The plague bacillus cannot fly far on its own. Instead, it borrows the bodies of other creatures to travel. Laid out as a diagram, that chain looks like this.

The chain of plague transmission (in the case of bubonic plague)

Bacteria ─▶ Settle inside the body of a rat
Rat      ─▶ Carrying the bacteria, move close to humans
Flea     ─▶ Suck the infected rat's blood and take on the bacteria
Human    ─▶ Bitten by that flea, exposed to the bacteria

* Pneumonic plague skips this chain and spreads directly through human coughing.

There is a cruel efficiency hidden in this chain. The bacteria are known to block the flea's digestive tract, so that the starving flea bites people more fiercely and more often. In other words, the bacteria alter even the behavior of their carrier so as to spread themselves more easily.

On top of this there was a still more frightening form. That was pneumonic plague. Once the bacteria settled in the lungs, the disease could pass straight from one person to another through nothing more than the patient's coughing and droplets.

To put it simply, if bubonic plague was the slow road that passed through the flea as a kind of delivery courier, pneumonic plague was the shortcut that skipped that courier and passed directly through the air. Here lies the reason why family members nursing a patient so often collapsed from the same disease within a few days.

Why, then, did people fall so helplessly? The greatest reason was the absence of immunity.

The reason we hold up to a certain degree against some diseases today is that our bodies, or our societies, have encountered those diseases before.

That is to say, the immune system in our bodies recognizes and responds relatively quickly to an enemy it has fought once. But to the great majority of fourteenth-century Europeans, this pestilence was an utterly unfamiliar intruder.

Because it was an enemy the body had never met, the immune system had not even the time to set up a proper line of defense. It was as though one stood wholly exposed before a foe seen for the first time.

What is more, there was virtually no effective treatment in that age. Antibiotics would appear only hundreds of years later.

So once the bacteria entered the body, a person's fate was left largely to that person's strength and to chance. Many who could have been saved today with proper treatment lost their lives simply because they were born into the wrong age.

To sum it up: a powerful bacterium, a carrier that diligently ferried it, people without immunity, and the absence of any cure. When these four things meshed together all at once, catastrophe became something hard to escape.

What drove people of the time to particular despair was the swift progress of this disease. It was not rare, we are told, for a perfectly healthy person to die within a few days. The descriptions vary from source to source, but again and again the testimony appears that the time from onset to death was very short.

To organize this terrifying speed conceptually, it looks as follows. Let me make clear that the diagram below is not actual medical data, but a simplification meant to help us gauge what the dread of that age was like.

The swift progress of the Black Death as people of the age felt it (a conceptual sketch)

Onset       ─▶ High fever and chills, swellings beginning to form
Worsening   ─▶ Symptoms sharply intensify within a few days
Despair     ─▶ With no proper treatment, little can be done
Parting     ─▶ Within a short time, many leave the world

* The flow above is a conceptual sketch simplifying the lived sense of the age.

Such swift progress gave people no time even to prepare their hearts. As the neighbor with whom one exchanged greetings yesterday went missing today, over and over, whole cities sank into a chronic dread.

How Did It Spread So Fast?

The speed of the Black Death's spread felt almost supernatural to people of the time. There were several reasons for this.

The main routes by which the Black Death spread quickly (a conceptual sketch)

Trade routes ─▶ From the East to Europe via the Silk Road and sea trade
Ports        ─▶ Rats and fleas aboard ships into port cities
Cities       ─▶ Explosive spread through dense population and poor sanitation
Pilgrimage and war ─▶ Following human movement deep into the interior

* The sketch above simplifies the flow of transmission.

Medieval Europe was a far more connected world than we usually imagine. The trade routes linking East and West carried more than silk and spices alone.

Along those roads, the rats and fleas that carried disease moved as well. The pestilence landed at every port a trading ship reached, and from there spread inland along roads and rivers.

What is more, the sanitary state of cities at the time was very poor. People, livestock, and rats lived tangled together in narrow alleys, and notions of clean water and hygiene were thin.

Once the pestilence entered a city, it was like a spark fallen on a dry field. There was scarcely any way to put out the spark, scarcely any firebreak to halt the blaze.

Interestingly, among the responses people instinctively reached for were some that align with the principles of modern disease control.

Some port cities held arriving ships outside the harbor for a set period. The word quarantine, it is said, derives from a term meaning forty days.

They did not know the mechanism precisely, but through experience people were dimly coming to learn that distancing and isolation worked.

A Thought Experiment — A City Physician's Year of 1348

Let us feel this age in a slightly different way. Instead of statistics, let us borrow the eyes of a single person. Imagine becoming a physician in some Italian city in the year 1348.

Before the Black Death struck, your days were relatively peaceful. You went to see a child wracked with fever, looked in on a mother about to give birth, soothed the aching joints of the elderly. As a man who had studied the courses of the stars and the balance of the four humors, you enjoyed the respect of the city.

Then one spring, a strange rumor reaches you from the harbor. Sailors from a ship out of the East are collapsing for no apparent reason, the story goes. A few days later, the first patient comes to you. A young man with a dark, hard swelling in his groin, wracked with high fever.

You prescribe as you were taught. You draw blood, you burn incense, you counsel prayer. Yet three days later he breathes his last. And the next day, his mother knocks at your door with the same symptoms.

After a few weeks the city has changed beyond recognition. The bells toll without ceasing, until at some moment even the people to ring them have vanished. The marketplace stands empty, and in the streets handcarts haul away the dead. The medicine you spent your whole life learning is powerless before this disease.

Let us pause here and think. If you had been that physician, what would you have done? Would you have stayed beside your patients, or fled the city? What would you have said to the people who came to you trusting you? These are questions with no right answer, yet simply holding them brings the weight that people of that age faced a little closer to us.

What this thought experiment teaches is plain. The Black Death was not a number within statistics, but the sum of each single person's helplessness and fear, and of the choices, made even within that, to care for someone all the same.

One Peasant's Life — Before and After the Black Death

This time, let us sketch not a physician but how the life of one ordinary peasant might have changed. Setting the same person's before and after side by side, the texture of the change the Black Death wrought comes into sharper relief.

Picture him before the Black Death. He was fated to live his whole life in the village where he was born. He tilled the lord's land, paid his appointed share, and could not leave even if he wished to. People were many and land was limited, so his labor was common and cheap. The very idea of demanding a better wage was unreal.

But after the pestilence had swept through the village and passed on, the world had turned strange.

Half of his neighbors had vanished, and land with no one to till it stood empty here and there. The lord stamped his feet for want of hands. The man who had treated him carelessly until yesterday now began to tread carefully, lest he leave.

He realizes, all at once. The lord of the next village over was offering better terms. For the first time, something called a choice had come to him.

This one person's change may look small, but imagine the same thing happening to a great many peasants all at once. Gathered together, it becomes an enormous pressure that moves an entire society. Behind the macroscopic statistics, it was precisely these small changes in one person after another, packed densely together.

Of course, this change did not at once mean happiness. He had to live carrying the deep grief of lost family and neighbors. Even if the breadth of his freedom had widened a little, the price was far too cruel. The irony of history always holds light and shadow together like this.

The Medieval Order Is Shaken

What makes the Black Death terrifying is not merely that it killed so many people. It is that it shook, all at once, the pillars of belief and order that held up medieval society.

Medieval society is often described as standing upon three great pillars. The Church that governed people's hearts, the relationship of lord and peasant that bound people's labor, and the old beliefs that took all of it for granted.

The Black Death shook these three pillars all at once. Rather than any one of them collapsing, it is closer to say that the very ground supporting them was shaken. Let us look in turn at how that shaking showed itself.

Cracks in the Authority of the Church

In medieval Europe, the Church was the absolute authority that explained life and death. Yet before the Black Death, neither the prayers of priests, nor pilgrimages to holy sites, nor any act of faith could stop the disease.

What is more, the clergy who cared for the sick often became infected and died in even greater numbers. The sight of those who were meant to comfort others falling first left a heavy question mark upon the weight of faith.

This left a deep fissure in people's hearts. Some plunged into a more frenzied faith. Bands appeared who marched through the streets whipping themselves.

Others, by contrast, began to question the authority of the Church. The question of whether the Church was strictly necessary between God and humanity is sometimes regarded as one distant starting point of the long current that later led to the Reformation.

Even here, though, caution is needed. It is hard to say that the Black Death toppled the Church straightaway. Many people, rather, found solace in a deeper faith. It is more accurate to see the change as having come not in a single stroke, but seeping in very slowly.

The Fracturing of Feudal Order

A more direct and enormous change occurred in the social and economic structure. The core is simple. So many people died that workers became scarce.

The Great Shift in Population, Economy, and Labor — The Paradox of the Survivors

Here the most painful and most fascinating paradox of history appears. The terrible death opened, at least economically, new opportunities for those who survived.

Before the Black Death, Europe was close to saturated in population. There were many people relative to the land, so labor was common and cheap.

The great majority of peasants worked for little, bound to the lord's land. They had almost no freedom to move their place of work, and almost no power to demand a better wage.

But when a large share of the population vanished, the situation turned over. The scales of supply and demand tipped wholesale.

CategoryBefore the Black DeathAfter the Black Death
LaborCommon and cheapScarce and costly
WagesHeld down lowUnder upward pressure
Peasants' bargaining powerWeakRelatively stronger
Emptied landAlmost noneAppearing everywhere

The surviving peasants and workers could now demand better terms. If one lord would not raise wages, they could simply go to another.

The lords even passed laws to fix wages by force, trying to halt such change. But no law could forever hold down the reality of an absolute shortage of labor.

Of course, this change was not smooth. Pent-up grievances burst out in peasant revolts in various places. The change was not given peacefully; it is closer to say it was won little by little through conflict and resistance.

Yet over the long run, many historians judge that the Black Death played a part in loosening the chains of feudal bondage that tied peasants to the land. Death, paradoxically, slightly widened the freedom of the living.

The Link to the Renaissance — A New Light Called by Death?

The relationship between the Black Death and the Renaissance is a fascinating subject of debate in the study of history. Some scholars see the Black Death as having played a certain role in preparing the soil for the Renaissance.

This, however, is one interpretation. It is worth making clear that the causes of the Renaissance cannot be reduced to the Black Death alone.

The arguments commonly offered by those who support this link are as follows.

  • Redistribution of wealth: As the population fell, the land and property that fell to each surviving person grew, and this may have become spare capital to invest in art and learning.
  • A new gaze on humanity and life: There is an interpretation that people who had lived through vast death turned their eyes more to the value of this life here and now, rather than the afterlife.
  • Labor shortage spurring technical innovation: There is also a view that, as people grew scarce, interest in labor-saving tools and methods increased.

There are, of course, counterarguments. There exists a view that the seeds of the Renaissance had already begun sprouting before the Black Death, and that the Black Death only obstructed that current.

Indeed, while the Black Death was at its height, art and learning, far from blossoming, were a time when society as a whole had to cling to mere survival. It is rare for the results of a vast change to appear at once. Between the Black Death and the Renaissance, too, there lay a considerable gap of time.

So cautious historians, rather than declaring that the Black Death gave birth to the Renaissance, express it carefully, to the effect that the various changes the Black Death wrought may have formed part of the soil in which the Renaissance could grow. It is an attitude that does not carelessly draw the arrow of causation too thick.

History is not cleanly explained by a single cause. Yet one thing seems clear. A death so vast could not possibly have passed without changing people's worldview and social structure.

Setting Common Misconceptions Straight

The Black Death is such a famous event that many received notions, in which fact and story are mixed together, have attached themselves to it. Let us calmly take up a few of the misconceptions one often meets.

Misconception 1 — The bird-beak doctor's mask is from the time of the Black Death

The image of the plague doctor wearing a long, pointed mask shaped like a bird's beak is known almost as a symbol representing the Black Death. Yet this mask is thought not to be an object from the time of the fourteenth-century great outbreak.

This beaked mask, it is said, appeared much later, around the seventeenth century. The explanation that follows is that the beak was filled with aromatics to ward off the bad air.

In other words, the mask we commonly picture when we think of the Black Death of the 1340s is in fact closer to a scene some three hundred years later than that age. A striking image, leaping across the eras, has been lumped together into one.

Misconception 2 — The ring-of-roses song came from the Black Death

The story that a famous children's song in the English-speaking world depicts the symptoms and death of the Black Death has spread widely. It is an interpretation holding that the expressions in the song point to a rash, to aromatics, and to everyone falling down.

Yet many scholars find the grounds to support this link weak. The lyrics of this song appeared in the record only hundreds of years after the Black Death, and the form of the lyrics differed from region to region.

The more tempting and eerie the tale, the more we need the care to weigh once more whether it is truly fact. That, in itself, is a good attitude for the study of history.

Misconception 3 — People of the time all regarded it solely as a punishment from God

It is true that many people interpreted the Black Death as the wrath of God. Yet it is hard to declare that everyone thought only in that way.

In the same age, some sought natural causes such as bad air or the alignment of the stars. Some cities even attempted practical measures such as isolation and cleanliness.

In other words, it is not fair to lump medieval people together as nothing but ignorant and superstitious beings. They were people who, within the limits of the knowledge they had, asked after causes and sought responses in their own ways.

Misconception 4 — The Black Death was an event for Europe alone

Because the Black Death is treated so vividly in European history, it is often remembered as though it were a tragedy of Europe alone. Yet this pestilence is thought to have affected various regions both before it reached Europe and afterward.

The road of the pestilence stretched broadly along the trade routes. To understand the Black Death fully, it is better to call to mind not the single stage of Europe alone, but the wider web of connections of the broader world.

The Name Black Death and a Culture That Faced Death

This pestilence was not, it is told, called the Black Death from the very start. People of the age, it is known, commonly used expressions such as the great death or the great pestilence.

There are several theories as to how the expression black became fixed. One explanation holds it came from the symptom of lymph nodes swelling black; another view holds that an expression carrying the sense of dreadful was later translated as black and so became fixed.

Either way, even a single name carries within it how that age was remembered. In the words black death, the dread of that age, as though the light had vanished, seems to seep through just as it was.

What is interesting is the fact that this vast death left a deep mark on people's culture and art as well. In the European art and literature of around this period, the theme of looking death squarely in the face appears often.

It is thought to be around this time, too, that images depicting death coming to all alike, regardless of rank or age, spread widely. The sense that whether king or peasant, before death all are equal, was carved into people's hearts.

This was not simply a gloomy taste. It can be seen as one way in which a society that had suffered loss beyond bearing, instead of turning its face away from that death, looked straight at it and tried to work it out through stories. It is one of the old ways in which human beings handle vast grief.

Until the True Identity Was Known — A Realization That Took 500 Years

Here there is one fact we must not forget. The plague bacillus, the fleas, the chain of transmission we have spoken of until now were all uncovered by the science of later ages.

The people of that age, the one the Black Death swept through, knew none of these things. To them, the identity of this disease remained, to the end, an unsolved riddle.

The idea that bacteria cause disease, that is, germ theory, was widely accepted only in the nineteenth century, fully some five hundred years after the Black Death. Only after the development of the microscope and the dogged research of many scientists had accumulated did humanity come to accept that invisible microorganisms could be the cause of disease.

This fact awakens in us a curious humility. It is easy to scoff at fourteenth-century people for blaming the stars or bad air as foolish. But they had no tools at all with which to approach the truth.

Knowledge does not suddenly well up from the head of a single person. It is the result of a long journey in which many generations refine their tools and pile up observations, advancing one step at a time. Even a single piece of common sense we take for granted today stands upon someone's long labor.

So the story of the Black Death does not stop at being a tragedy of the past. It is also one scene in the long and slow journey by which humanity moved from ignorance toward knowledge, from fear toward understanding.

The Historical Lessons the Pandemic Left

Even today, nearly seven hundred years on, the Black Death still speaks to us.

The lessons we can draw from it are less firm conclusions than questions worth chewing over.

First, connection is a double-edged sword. A world busy with trade and movement is prosperous, but disease spreads just as fast through it.

That the Black Death could spread so far and so fast was, paradoxically, because the world of that time was well connected. This is a truth that does not change even today, when one reaches the other side of the globe in a single day by airplane. It means that as much as we enjoy the benefits of connection, we must also shoulder the risks that come with it.

Second, fear creates scapegoats. When the cause is unknown, people easily fall to the temptation of blaming someone.

The persecution of the innocent that occurred during the plague era is a painful example showing how dreadful a result that temptation can bring. The more critical the moment, the more important calm fact-checking and the protection of the vulnerable become, and this age tells us so as a cautionary mirror.

Third, crisis can be a catalyst for change. A great disaster exposes the weaknesses of the existing order. Sometimes, through those cracks, new institutions and ways of thinking grow.

Whether that change runs in a better direction, however, is not decided in advance. It depends, in the end, on the choices of the people who live through that age. We must not forget that disaster itself does not guarantee progress.

It is better to receive such lessons as open questions than as moral verdicts. History is not an answer key.

History is rather closer to a mirror that makes us ponder what we might do better when faced with the same kind of situation.

A Few Fascinating Facts

  • The Black Death did not end with one wave: Even after the great fourteenth-century outbreak, plague returned to Europe several times over the following centuries. It was not a single vast event but a threat repeated over long ages.
  • A trace left in the genes?: Some researchers have explored the possibility that the pressure of a vast pestilence left an imprint on immunity-related genetic traits in surviving populations. This is still an actively researched topic, and it is too early to be definitive.
  • The root of the word quarantine: As we saw earlier, the word quarantine is said to derive from a term meaning forty days. Even a word we use without a second thought carries within it traces of the people who fought the pestilence.
  • The people who left the records: The horror of the time was passed down to later ages through the records of monks, the administrative documents of cities, and works of literature. Even in the midst of death, someone left it down as a record, and thanks to that we can peer, however dimly, into a spring of seven hundred years ago.
  • Plague still exists today: The plague bacillus is not a vanished pathogen; it is a disease still reported, rarely, in some parts of the world today. In modern times, however, there are diagnostics and treatments, so it does not flare into a catastrophe like that of the fourteenth century. It shows well how greatly the outcome can differ, even with the same bacterium, according to the preparedness of the society that faces it.
  • The traces of empty villages: With the Black Death erasing populations, whole villages were sometimes abandoned. Forest sometimes returned to the land people had left, which is mentioned as an example showing that when human activity declines, nature quickly fills the space.

Food for Thought — A Short Quiz

  1. Recall two or three reasons the Black Death could spread so fast, focusing on those cited in the text.
  2. Draw the chain of plague transmission (bacteria, rat, flea, human) in your mind once more. Explain in your own words how pneumonic plague skips this chain.
  3. The fact that people of the time had almost no immunity and no treatment shows that the danger of the same disease can differ greatly by era. Think about what is different for us today.
  4. How did terrible death raise the bargaining power of surviving peasants and workers? Explain this paradox in your own words.
  5. Why does the text recommend a cautious attitude toward the claim that the Black Death called forth the Renaissance? What dangers arise when we oversimplify historical causation?
  6. Like the bird-beak mask or the children's song, recall another example in which fact and received notion are mixed together. What should we check before we accept a story as fact?

These questions have no fixed right answers. What matters is not getting the answer right, but the very attitude of chewing slowly over a single event from many angles. The pleasure of reading history lies precisely in that chewing.

Closing — Standing Before the Door Death Opened

The Black Death was one of the darkest times humanity has endured. Its suffering and loss can never be glorified by any historical lesson.

I want to make this point clear first. The dead were not statistics but the lives of one person and another and another. No vast change can make that weight any lighter.

Yet at the same time, that vast death, unintentionally, loosened the chains of the old order and flung open one door toward a new world.

The survivors became more costly labor. Before shaken authority they began to ask new questions. Upon that ground, the light of the next age grew little by little.

To say that death changes history is by no means to praise death.

It is, rather, a story addressed to the living: that even in the darkest moment, what comes next differs according to what the survivors choose.

Even beneath the empty bell tower of seven hundred years ago, someone who survived met spring again, and went on to build another world. And the records and changes they left behind are what allow us to read this story today.

The age in which we live, too, will someday be read as history by someone. The crises we face, and the choices we make before them, may yet, far in the future, become a scene for someone to chew over.

Thought of that way, the story of the Black Death does not stop at being a window through which we peer into the past. It is also a mirror in which we see reflected what kind of people we wish to become in the face of crisis.

Perhaps to read history is to borrow, for a moment, the hearts of those who waited again for spring beneath that empty bell tower. And one who has borrowed that heart may live their own age with a slightly deeper gaze.

References

Discuss on Twitter • View on GitHub