https://www.youngju.dev/blog 천천히 올바르게. AI Researcher & DevOps Engineer Youngju's blog. GPU/CUDA, LLM, MLOps, Kubernetes AI workloads, and data engineering — plus mindset essays on confidence, routines, health, and sport psychology. ko fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://www.youngju.dev/blog/psych-papers/milgram-obedience-reexamined.en https://www.youngju.dev/blog/psych-papers/milgram-obedience-reexamined.en The Milgram experiment, begun at Yale in 1961, has been summarized in one sentence for decades: 65 percent of participants went all the way to the maximum voltage. But that figure is the value from one of some 24 variations, and changing the conditions moved obedience anywhere from 0 percent to 92.5 percent. What Gina Perry confirmed in the Yale archives is evidence that the experimenter repeatedly applied pressure that was not in the script and that a substantial share of participants suspected the deception. Haslam and Reicher offer an alternative account — identification with the cause of science rather than blind obedience — and the 2009 partial replication by Burger obtained a comparable rate with a design that stopped at 150 volts. Here is what survives and what has to go. Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) psychologypaper-reviewsocial-psychologyobedienceresearch-ethics https://www.youngju.dev/blog/psych-papers/milgram-obedience-reexamined.ja https://www.youngju.dev/blog/psych-papers/milgram-obedience-reexamined.ja 1961年にイェールで始まったミルグラム実験は、参加者の65パーセントが最大電圧まで進んだという一文に要約されてきました。ところがその数字は24個にのぼる変形実験のうちひとつの値にすぎず、条件を変えると服従率は0パーセントから92.5パーセントまで動きました。ジーナ・ペリーがイェールの記録保管庫で確認したのは、実験者が台本にない圧力を繰り返しかけていたこと、そして相当数の参加者が仕掛けを疑っていたという証拠です。ハスラムとライヒャーは盲目的な服従の代わりに、科学という大義への同一視という代替説明を出し、2009年のバーガーによる部分再現は150ボルトで止める設計で近い比率を得ました。残るものと捨てるものを分けて整理します。 Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) psychologypaper-reviewsocial-psychologyobedienceresearch-ethics https://www.youngju.dev/blog/psych-papers/milgram-obedience-reexamined https://www.youngju.dev/blog/psych-papers/milgram-obedience-reexamined 1961년 예일에서 시작된 밀그램 실험은 참가자의 65퍼센트가 최대 전압까지 갔다는 한 문장으로 요약되어 왔습니다. 그런데 그 숫자는 24개에 이르는 변형 실험 중 하나의 값일 뿐이고, 조건을 바꾸면 복종률은 0퍼센트에서 92.5퍼센트까지 움직였습니다. 지나 페리가 예일 기록보관소에서 확인한 것은 실험자가 대본에 없는 압박을 반복했고 상당수 참가자가 속임수를 의심했다는 증거입니다. 하슬람과 라이커는 맹목적 복종 대신 과학이라는 대의에 대한 동일시라는 대안 설명을 내놓았고, 2009년 버거의 부분 재현은 150볼트에서 멈추는 설계로 비슷한 비율을 얻었습니다. 남는 것과 버릴 것을 나눠 정리합니다. Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) psychologypaper-reviewsocial-psychologyobedienceresearch-ethics https://www.youngju.dev/blog/psych-papers/milgram-obedience-reexamined.zh https://www.youngju.dev/blog/psych-papers/milgram-obedience-reexamined.zh 1961年始于耶鲁的米尔格拉姆实验，长期被压缩成一句话：65%的参与者一路加到了最高电压。可那个数字只是多达24个变式实验中某一个条件的值；换个条件，服从率会在0%到92.5%之间大幅摆动。吉娜·佩里在耶鲁档案室查到的，是实验者反复施加剧本之外的压力、且相当多参与者其实怀疑这是骗局的证据。哈斯拉姆与赖歇尔提出了另一种解释：不是盲目服从，而是对科学这一大义的认同；2009年伯格用只做到150伏就停下的设计做了部分重现，得到了接近的比例。本文把留得下的和该丢掉的分开来讲。 Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) psychologypaper-reviewsocial-psychologyobedienceresearch-ethics