https://www.youngju.dev/blog 천천히 올바르게. AI Researcher & DevOps Engineer Youngju's tech blog. GPU/CUDA, LLM, MLOps, Kubernetes AI workloads, distributed training, and data engineering. ko fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://www.youngju.dev/blog/2026-07-11-write-code-for-humans.en https://www.youngju.dev/blog/2026-07-11-write-code-for-humans.en On July 10, 2026, Scott Robinson revived an old maxim with a twist: an LLM reads your codebase as its style guide, so every shortcut you merge becomes training data it repeats back at machine scale. We walk through his duplicated access-check example and his line that LLMs are sponges. Then the harder question — does writing for humans still matter when a machine is the next maintainer? It does, because humans still review and debug, and clarity is what makes a diff reviewable. Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) aillmcode-qualitymaintainabilitycraft https://www.youngju.dev/blog/2026-07-11-write-code-for-humans.ja https://www.youngju.dev/blog/2026-07-11-write-code-for-humans.ja 2026年7月10日、Scott Robinson は古い格言を一ひねりして蘇らせました。LLM はあなたのコードベースをスタイルガイドのように読むため、あなたがマージしたあらゆる近道は、モデルが機械の規模で返してくる学習データになります。重複したアクセスチェックの例と、「LLM はスポンジだ」という彼の一文を追ったうえで、より難しい問いを立てます。次の保守者が機械であるときも、人間のために書くことは依然として重要か。重要です。人間は依然としてレビューしデバッグし、明快さこそが diff をレビュー可能にするからです。 Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) aillmcode-qualitymaintainabilitycraft https://www.youngju.dev/blog/2026-07-11-write-code-for-humans https://www.youngju.dev/blog/2026-07-11-write-code-for-humans 2026년 7월 10일, Scott Robinson은 오래된 격언을 한 번 비틀어 되살렸습니다. LLM은 당신의 코드베이스를 스타일 가이드처럼 읽기 때문에, 당신이 병합한 모든 지름길이 곧 모델이 기계 규모로 되돌려주는 학습 데이터가 됩니다. 중복된 접근 권한 검사 예시와 "LLM은 스펀지"라는 그의 문장을 짚은 뒤, 더 어려운 질문을 던집니다. 다음 유지보수자가 기계일 때도 사람을 위해 쓰는 일이 여전히 중요한가? 그렇습니다. 사람은 여전히 리뷰하고 디버깅하며, 명료함이야말로 diff를 리뷰 가능하게 만들기 때문입니다. Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT fjvbn2003@gmail.com (Youngju Kim) aillmcode-qualitymaintainabilitycraft