Split View: 플랫폼 아키텍처 의사결정 가이드: 모놀리스와 마이크로서비스 사이

[Monolith] -----> [Modular Monolith] -----> [Macroservices] -----> [Microservices]

  Single deployment    Module boundary       2-5 large services    Domain-specific
  unit                 separation                                  independent services
  Single DB            Per-module schema     Per-service DB        Per-service DB
  1 team               1-2 teams             2-5 teams             5+ teams
  Simple ops           Simple ops            Moderate ops          Complex ops

"""
Example of inter-module communication in a Modular Monolith.

When the order module accesses the payment module,
it goes through payment's public facade, not its internal implementation.
"""

# === payment/facade.py (payment module's public interface) ===
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Optional


@dataclass
class PaymentResult:
    reservation_id: str
    status: str
    amount: int
    currency: str


class PaymentFacade:
    """Payment module's public interface.

    Other modules access payment functionality only through this class.
    Direct access to internal implementation (repository, service, domain model) is prohibited.
    """

    def __init__(self, payment_service):
        self._service = payment_service

    def reserve_payment(
        self,
        customer_id: str,
        amount: int,
        currency: str = "KRW",
        idempotency_key: Optional[str] = None,
    ) -> PaymentResult:
        """Reserves a payment. Actual charge occurs at confirm time."""
        reservation = self._service.create_reservation(
            customer_id=customer_id,
            amount=amount,
            currency=currency,
            idempotency_key=idempotency_key,
        )
        return PaymentResult(
            reservation_id=reservation.id,
            status=reservation.status.value,
            amount=reservation.amount,
            currency=reservation.currency,
        )

    def confirm_payment(self, reservation_id: str) -> PaymentResult:
        """Confirms a reserved payment."""
        result = self._service.confirm(reservation_id)
        return PaymentResult(
            reservation_id=result.id,
            status=result.status.value,
            amount=result.amount,
            currency=result.currency,
        )

    def cancel_payment(self, reservation_id: str) -> None:
        """Cancels a reserved payment."""
        self._service.cancel(reservation_id)


# === order/service.py (using payment facade from order module) ===

class OrderService:
    """Order service.

    Does not depend on payment module's internal implementation,
    accesses payment functionality only through PaymentFacade.
    """

    def __init__(self, order_repo, payment_facade: PaymentFacade):
        self.order_repo = order_repo
        self.payment = payment_facade

    def create_order(self, customer_id: str, items: list, total: int) -> dict:
        # 1. Create order
        order = self.order_repo.create(
            customer_id=customer_id,
            items=items,
            total=total,
        )

        # 2. Reserve payment (through payment facade)
        try:
            payment_result = self.payment.reserve_payment(
                customer_id=customer_id,
                amount=total,
                idempotency_key=f"order-{order.id}",
            )
            order.payment_reservation_id = payment_result.reservation_id
            self.order_repo.save(order)
        except Exception as e:
            order.status = "payment_failed"
            self.order_repo.save(order)
            raise

        return {"order_id": order.id, "status": order.status}

"""
Module boundary violation detection script.

Each module can only import the facade of other modules.
Directly importing internal packages (service, repository, domain) is a violation.
"""
import ast
import sys
from pathlib import Path
from dataclasses import dataclass


@dataclass
class Violation:
    file: str
    line: int
    importing_module: str
    imported_module: str
    imported_path: str
    reason: str


# Module list and allowed public packages
MODULE_CONFIG = {
    "order": {"public": ["order.facade"]},
    "payment": {"public": ["payment.facade"]},
    "inventory": {"public": ["inventory.facade"]},
    "shipping": {"public": ["shipping.facade"]},
    "user": {"public": ["user.facade"]},
}


def get_module_name(file_path: str) -> str | None:
    """Extracts module name from file path."""
    parts = Path(file_path).parts
    for module_name in MODULE_CONFIG:
        if module_name in parts:
            return module_name
    return None


def check_file(file_path: str) -> list[Violation]:
    """Inspects imports in a single file and returns a list of violations."""
    violations = []
    source_module = get_module_name(file_path)
    if source_module is None:
        return violations

    with open(file_path) as f:
        try:
            tree = ast.parse(f.read())
        except SyntaxError:
            return violations

    for node in ast.walk(tree):
        if isinstance(node, ast.Import):
            for alias in node.names:
                _check_import(file_path, source_module, alias.name, node.lineno, violations)
        elif isinstance(node, ast.ImportFrom) and node.module:
            _check_import(file_path, source_module, node.module, node.lineno, violations)

    return violations


def _check_import(
    file_path: str,
    source_module: str,
    imported_path: str,
    line: int,
    violations: list[Violation],
):
    """Checks whether an individual import statement violates module boundaries."""
    for target_module, config in MODULE_CONFIG.items():
        if target_module == source_module:
            continue  # Internal imports within the same module are OK

        if imported_path.startswith(target_module + "."):
            # Importing from another module -> check if it's a public package
            is_public = any(
                imported_path.startswith(pub)
                for pub in config["public"]
            )
            if not is_public:
                violations.append(Violation(
                    file=file_path,
                    line=line,
                    importing_module=source_module,
                    imported_module=target_module,
                    imported_path=imported_path,
                    reason=f"Direct import of '{target_module}' internals. "
                           f"Use {config['public']} instead.",
                ))


def main():
    """Inspects all files in the project and reports violations."""
    project_root = Path(sys.argv[1]) if len(sys.argv) > 1 else Path(".")
    all_violations = []

    for py_file in project_root.rglob("*.py"):
        violations = check_file(str(py_file))
        all_violations.extend(violations)

    if all_violations:
        print(f"\n{'='*60}")
        print(f"Module boundary violations found: {len(all_violations)}")
        print(f"{'='*60}\n")
        for v in all_violations:
            print(f"  {v.file}:{v.line}")
            print(f"    {v.importing_module} -> {v.imported_module} ({v.imported_path})")
            print(f"    {v.reason}\n")
        sys.exit(1)
    else:
        print("No module boundary violations found.")
        sys.exit(0)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

# .github/workflows/boundary-check.yml
name: Module Boundary Check
on: [pull_request]
jobs:
  check:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with:
          python-version: '3.12'
      - run: python scripts/check_module_boundaries.py src/

# ADR-007: Separating Payment Module into an Independent Service

## Status: Approved (2026-02-15)

## Context

Currently, the payment module is called through a facade inside the monolith.
To reduce PCI-DSS certification scope, payment processing needs to be separated into a standalone service.
Additionally, the payment service needs to scale independently from the order service
(payment traffic increases 10x during Black Friday).

## Decision

Separate the payment module into an independent gRPC service.

- Communication: gRPC (internal), REST (external PG integration)
- DB: Separate PostgreSQL instance
- Consistency: Saga pattern (orchestration approach)
- Deployment: Independent Kubernetes deployment

## Consequences

### Positive

- PCI-DSS certification scope limited to payment service
- Payment service can scale independently
- No need to redeploy order service when payment logic changes

### Negative

- Additional inter-service communication latency (~5ms)
- Need to implement and operate Saga compensating transactions
- Increased operational complexity: separate monitoring, deployment pipeline

### Quantitative Basis

- Current payment p99 latency: 150ms -> Post-separation estimate: 155ms (acceptable)
- Current PCI certification scope: entire infrastructure -> Post-separation: payment service only
- Infrastructure cost increase: $200/month (separate DB + service instances)

## Alternatives Considered

1. Maintain monolith + certify entire PCI scope: High cost and audit burden
2. Separate payment as serverless (Lambda): p99 latency uncertain due to cold start issues

Phase 1: Modular Monolith (1-3 months)
  - Establish module boundaries in code
  - Introduce facade interfaces
  - Build boundary violation detection CI
  - Logically separate DB schema per module

Phase 2: First Service Extraction (2-4 months)
  - Separate the most independent module as a service
  - Decide communication protocol (gRPC/REST/Events)
  - Implement Saga or event-based consistency
  - A/B routing for parallel operation of new service and existing module

Phase 3: Stabilization and Expansion (3-6 months)
  - Confirm operational stability of first service
  - Establish monitoring, alerting, runbooks
  - Select next separation target and repeat

Phase 4: Platform Maturity (ongoing)
  - Introduce service mesh / API gateway
  - Build distributed tracing system
  - Service catalog and ownership management

"""
Gate check for determining whether migration phase can proceed.

After completing each phase, this check must pass
before proceeding to the next phase.
"""
from dataclasses import dataclass


@dataclass
class PhaseGateCheck:
    name: str
    passed: bool
    detail: str


def check_phase1_gate() -> list[PhaseGateCheck]:
    """Phase 1 completion gate: Has modular monolith conversion been sufficient."""
    return [
        PhaseGateCheck(
            name="module_boundaries_defined",
            passed=True,  # Actually checks code analysis results
            detail="All modules have facade interfaces",
        ),
        PhaseGateCheck(
            name="no_boundary_violations",
            passed=True,  # Confirmed 0 violations in CI
            detail="0 boundary violations in last 30 days",
        ),
        PhaseGateCheck(
            name="schema_separated",
            passed=True,  # Confirmed DB schema separation
            detail="Each module uses its own schema prefix",
        ),
        PhaseGateCheck(
            name="integration_tests_exist",
            passed=True,
            detail="Module integration tests cover 85%+ of facade methods",
        ),
    ]


def check_phase2_gate() -> list[PhaseGateCheck]:
    """Phase 2 completion gate: Is the first service extraction stable."""
    return [
        PhaseGateCheck(
            name="service_p99_latency",
            passed=True,   # Based on actual metrics
            detail="p99 latency < 200ms for 14 consecutive days",
        ),
        PhaseGateCheck(
            name="error_rate",
            passed=True,
            detail="Error rate < 0.1% for 14 consecutive days",
        ),
        PhaseGateCheck(
            name="saga_compensation_tested",
            passed=True,
            detail="Compensation scenarios tested in staging 3+ times",
        ),
        PhaseGateCheck(
            name="runbook_documented",
            passed=True,
            detail="Incident runbook reviewed by on-call team",
        ),
        PhaseGateCheck(
            name="rollback_verified",
            passed=True,
            detail="Rollback to monolith path verified in staging",
        ),
    ]


def evaluate_gate(checks: list[PhaseGateCheck]) -> tuple[bool, str]:
    """Determines whether the gate passes."""
    failed = [c for c in checks if not c.passed]
    if failed:
        details = "; ".join(f"{c.name}: {c.detail}" for c in failed)
        return False, f"Gate BLOCKED - {len(failed)} checks failed: {details}"
    return True, "Gate PASSED - all checks passed"